Kema, Inc et al v. Koperwhats et al

Filing 53

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. The deadline to complete mediation is 90 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 10, 2009. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION KEMA, INC., a Virginia Corporation, and RLW ANALYTICS, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, NO. 3:09-cv-01587-MMC 7 vs. 8 9 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Counterclaim Defendants. 19 20 vs. KEMA, INC., a Virginia Corporation, RLW ANALYTICS, INC., a California Corporation, Axmor Software, and Curt D. Puckett, an individual, WILLIAM KOPERWHATS, an individual and MILOSLICK SCIENTIFIC, a California Company, Counterclaim Plaintiffs, WILLIAM KOPERWHATS, an individual and MILOSLICK SCIENTIFIC, a California Company, STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the 21 following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: 22 The parties agree to participate in the following ADR Process: Mediation (ADR LR 6) 23 24 The parties agree to hold the ADR session within 90 days of the date of this order, pending the 25 availability of their parties and their counsel. 26 27 // 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Dated: July ____, 2009 G C A Law Partners LLP /s/ By: _________________________________ V a le rie M. Wagner, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants, KEMA, INC., RLW ANALYTICS, INC., and Counterclaim-Defendant Curt D. Puckett. Dated: July ____, 2009 M a n d e l & Adriano By: /s/ _________________________________ S a ra lyn Mandel, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, William Koperwhats and Miloslick Scientific 9 10 11 Dated: July ____, 2009 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process M o r g a n , Franich, Fredkin & Marsh By: /s/ _________________________________ Linda M. MacLeod, Esq. Attorneys for Specially Appearing Counterclaim Defendant, AXMOR SOFTWARE-AMERICA, INC. 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [P R O P O S E D ] ORDER P u r s u a n t to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to: Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) D e a d lin e for ADR session is 90 days from the date of this order subject to availability o f parties and their counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED. July 10, 2009 D a te d : _________________ ___________________________________ J u d g e Maxine M. Chesney Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?