Dudek v. Law Office of Scott Carruthers

Filing 26

ORDER resetting cmc from 10/21/09 to 12/16/09 25 Notice (Other) filed by Rae Dudek. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/15/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Ryan Lee, Esq. (SBN 235879) Krohn & Moss, Ltd. 10474 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 401 Los Angeles, CA 90025 T: (323) 988-2400; F: (866) 802-0021 rlee@consumerlawcenter.com Attorneys for Plaintiff, Rae Dudek UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) Case No.: C 09-01591 EMC ) ) Plaintiff, ) NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT ) vs. ) ORDER RESETTING CMC LAW OFFICE OF SCOTT CARRUTHERS., ) ) ) Defendant. ) RAE DUDEK, ; NOW COMES the Plaintiff, RAE DUDEK, by and through the undersigned counsel and hereby informs the court that a settlement of the present matter has been reached and is in the process of finalizing settlement, which Plaintiff anticipates will be finalized within the next 40 days. The terms of the settlement include a provision that the court retain jurisdiction over the parties for purposes of a fee petition that will be filed by Plaintiff. Plaintiff therefore requests that this honorable court vacate all dates currently set on calendar for the present matter. Respectfully Submitted, -1Notice of Settlement 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DATED: October 14, 2009 KROHN & MOSS, LTD. By: /s/ Ryan Lee Ryan Lee Attorney for Plaintiff _ IT IS SO ORDERED that the case management conference is reset from 10/21/09 at 1:30 p.m. to 12/16/09 at 2:30 p.m. A Joint CMC Statement shall be filed by 12/9/09. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ER N D IS T IC T R OF Notice of Settlement A C -2- LI FO dward Judge E M. Che n R NIA ____________________ Edward M. Chen DERED SO OR ED U.S. Magistrate Judge IS IT IFI UNIT ED 11 S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O AS MO D NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?