Fleming v. Clark
Filing
103
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST TO RE-OPEN DISCOVERY re (101 in 3:09-cv-01613-BZ) Letter filed by Novender Fleming. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 5/12/2010. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. NADIA CLARK, et al., Defendant(s). v. NADIA CLARK, et al., Defendant(s). VICTOR JONES, Plaintiff(s), NOVENDER FLEMING, Plaintiff(s), ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. C09-1613 BZ
and Consolidated Case
No. C09-4757 BZ ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST TO RE-OPEN DISCOVERY
Plaintiffs' request to re-open discovery (Doc. No. 101) is DENIED. In their motion for leave to amend the complaint,
plaintiffs stated that "it makes sense to add all relevant claims, particularly those that do not require additional discovery, especially those that are supported by the evidence." Doc. No. 75 p. 2. Plaintiffs characterized their
amendment as "academic" and "supported by the discovery thus 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
far."
Id. at 3.
Finally, plaintiffs directly stated that
they did not "foresee" any additional discovery being necessary, which was a representation that the Court relied upon when ruling on the motion to amend. Dated: May 12, 2010 Doc. No. 76 ¶ 17.
Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge
G:\BZALL\-BZCASES\FLEMING v. CLARK\ORDER DENYING PLT'S REQUEST TO RE-OPEN DISCOVERY.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?