Hatcher v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 97

ORDER by Judge Thelton E. Henderson denying as moot 90 Defendants' Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. (tehlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2011)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

BILLY J. HATCHER,

8
9

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

ORDER DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR JUDGMENT AS A
MATTER OF LAW

v.

10

United States District Court

NO. C09-1650 TEH

Plaintiff,

Defendants.

12
13

After the close of evidence, Defendants moved for judgment as a matter of law

14 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50. The Court took the motion under submission
15 and submitted the entire case to the jury. On June 16, 2011, the jury returned a verdict in
16 favor of Defendants on all questions. Accordingly, Defendants’ motion for judgment as a
17 matter of law is hereby DENIED as moot.
18
19 IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
21 Dated: 06/20/11
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT