Plantronics, Inc. v. ALIPH, INC. et al
Filing
160
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MOTIONS TO COMPEL FACT DISCOVERY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/30/2011. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2011)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
& SULLIVAN, LLP
2
Robert P. Feldman (Bar No. 69602)
bobfeldman@quinnemanuel.com
3
Gabriel S. Gross (Bar No. 254672)
gabegross@quinnemanuel.com
4 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
5 Telephone:
(650) 801-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 801-5100
6
Attorneys for Defendants Aliph, Inc. and
7 Aliphcom, Inc.
8
9
10
CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS
David C. Bohrer (Bar No. 212397)
dbohrer@confluencelaw.com
60 South Market Street, Suite 1400
San Jose, California 95113-2396
Telephone:
(408) 938-3882
Facsimile:
(408) 971-4332
CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP
Bruce G. Chapman (Bar No. 164258)
bchapman@cblh.com
Keith D. Fraser (Bar No. 216279)
kfraser@cblh.com
333 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2300
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone:
(213) 787-2500
Facsimile:
(213) 687-0498
Attorneys for Plaintiff Plantronics, Inc.
11
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
PLANTRONICS, INC.,
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ
18
Plaintiff,
19
20
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
MOTIONS TO COMPEL FACT
DISCOVERY
v.
21 ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC.,
CIV. L.R. 6-2
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MOTIONS TO COMPEL
1
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Defendants Aliph, Inc. and AliphCom, Inc. and Plaintiff
2 Plantronics, Inc., by and through their counsel, hereby submit the following stipulation and
3 proposed order.
4
WHEREAS, the Court has set the date for the “Fact Discovery Cut-off” to be November
5 23, 2011 (Order, D.N. 91);
6
WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 37-3, motions to compel fact discovery may not
7 be filed more than 7 days after the Fact Discovery Cut-off, except by order of the Court for good
8 cause shown;
9
WHEREAS, in this case, the 7 days between the Fact Discovery Cut-off and the deadline
10 for filing motions to compel included the Thanksgiving holiday;
11
WHEREAS, the parties are actively engaged in meeting and conferring to resolve
12 outstanding discovery issues, and believe that additional time before the deadline for motions to
13 compel will enable them to narrow, if not resolve any such issues;
14
ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree that the deadline for filing a motion to compel should
15 be extended one week to December 7, 2011, and that compliance with the deadline will be met by
16 filing a letter requesting a conference with the Court regarding a fact discovery dispute, pursuant
17 the Court’s Initial Discovery Order.
18
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MOTIONS TO COMPEL
1 Dated: November 29, 2011
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
LLP
2
3
By: /s/ Gabriel S. Gross
Gabriel S. Gross
Attorneys for Defendants
ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC.
4
5
6
Dated: November 29, 2011
CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS
7
8
9
10
By: /s/ David Bohrer
David Bohrer
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PLANTRONICS, INC.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO
ORDERED.
2
3
30
DATED: November ___, 2011
4
5
6
Hon. Bernard Zimmerman
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
I, Dane Reinstedt, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to
14
file this document. Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that David Bohrer, counsel
15
for Plaintiff and Gabriel Gross, counsel for Defendant, have concurred in this filing.
16
Dated: November 29, 2011
17
____/s/ Dane Reinstedt________
18
Dane Reinstedt
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MOTIONS TO COMPEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?