Plantronics, Inc. v. ALIPH, INC. et al

Filing 160

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MOTIONS TO COMPEL FACT DISCOVERY. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman on 11/30/2011. (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2011)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 2 Robert P. Feldman (Bar No. 69602) bobfeldman@quinnemanuel.com 3 Gabriel S. Gross (Bar No. 254672) gabegross@quinnemanuel.com 4 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 5 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 6 Attorneys for Defendants Aliph, Inc. and 7 Aliphcom, Inc. 8 9 10 CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS David C. Bohrer (Bar No. 212397) dbohrer@confluencelaw.com 60 South Market Street, Suite 1400 San Jose, California 95113-2396 Telephone: (408) 938-3882 Facsimile: (408) 971-4332 CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP Bruce G. Chapman (Bar No. 164258) bchapman@cblh.com Keith D. Fraser (Bar No. 216279) kfraser@cblh.com 333 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2300 Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 787-2500 Facsimile: (213) 687-0498 Attorneys for Plaintiff Plantronics, Inc. 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 PLANTRONICS, INC., Case No. C 09-01714 BZ 18 Plaintiff, 19 20 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MOTIONS TO COMPEL FACT DISCOVERY v. 21 ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC., CIV. L.R. 6-2 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 09-01714 BZ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MOTIONS TO COMPEL 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Defendants Aliph, Inc. and AliphCom, Inc. and Plaintiff 2 Plantronics, Inc., by and through their counsel, hereby submit the following stipulation and 3 proposed order. 4 WHEREAS, the Court has set the date for the “Fact Discovery Cut-off” to be November 5 23, 2011 (Order, D.N. 91); 6 WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 37-3, motions to compel fact discovery may not 7 be filed more than 7 days after the Fact Discovery Cut-off, except by order of the Court for good 8 cause shown; 9 WHEREAS, in this case, the 7 days between the Fact Discovery Cut-off and the deadline 10 for filing motions to compel included the Thanksgiving holiday; 11 WHEREAS, the parties are actively engaged in meeting and conferring to resolve 12 outstanding discovery issues, and believe that additional time before the deadline for motions to 13 compel will enable them to narrow, if not resolve any such issues; 14 ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree that the deadline for filing a motion to compel should 15 be extended one week to December 7, 2011, and that compliance with the deadline will be met by 16 filing a letter requesting a conference with the Court regarding a fact discovery dispute, pursuant 17 the Court’s Initial Discovery Order. 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 09-01714 BZ -1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MOTIONS TO COMPEL 1 Dated: November 29, 2011 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Gabriel S. Gross Gabriel S. Gross Attorneys for Defendants ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC. 4 5 6 Dated: November 29, 2011 CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS 7 8 9 10 By: /s/ David Bohrer David Bohrer Attorneys for Plaintiff PLANTRONICS, INC. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 09-01714 BZ -2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 30 DATED: November ___, 2011 4 5 6 Hon. Bernard Zimmerman United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 I, Dane Reinstedt, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to 14 file this document. Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that David Bohrer, counsel 15 for Plaintiff and Gabriel Gross, counsel for Defendant, have concurred in this filing. 16 Dated: November 29, 2011 17 ____/s/ Dane Reinstedt________ 18 Dane Reinstedt 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C 09-01714 BZ -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MOTIONS TO COMPEL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?