Plantronics, Inc. v. ALIPH, INC. et al
Filing
164
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 162 Stipulation filed by Plantronics, Inc.. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on December 7, 2011. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2011)
Case3:09-cv-01714-BZ Document162
CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS
1 David C. Bohrer (Bar No. 212397)
dbohrer@confluencelaw.com
2 60 South Market Street, Suite 1400
San Jose, California 95113-2396
3 Telephone:
(408) 938-3882
Facsimile:
(408) 971-4332
4
CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP
5 Bruce G. Chapman (Bar No. 164258)
bchapman@cblh.com
6 Keith D. Fraser (Bar No. 216279)
kfraser@cblh.com
7 333 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2300
Los Angeles, California 90071
8 Telephone:
(213) 787-2500
Facsimile:
(213) 687-0498
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff Plantronics, Inc.
10
Filed12/06/11 Page1 of 4
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
& SULLIVAN, LLP
Robert P. Feldman (Bar No. 69602)
bobfeldman@quinnemanuel.com
Gabriel S. Gross (Bar No. 254672)
gabegross@quinnemanuel.com
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Attorneys for Defendants Aliph, Inc. and
Aliphcom, Inc.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15 PLANTRONICS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
16
17
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
v.
18 ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC.,
19
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ (EDL)
CIV. L.R. 6-2
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR DEMAND LETTER
Case3:09-cv-01714-BZ Document162
1
Filed12/06/11 Page2 of 4
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Defendants Aliph, Inc. and AliphCom, Inc. and Plaintiff
2 Plantronics, Inc., by and through their counsel, hereby submit the following stipulation and
3 proposed order.
4
WHEREAS, Judge Zimmerman has referred this matter to Judge Laporte for Settlement
5 Conference;
6
WHEREAS, the parties expect to submit to Judge LaPorte their respective Confidential
7 Conference Statements today per the applicable scheduling orders (Dkts. 156 and 146);
8
WHEREAS, plaintiff Plantronics has advised that it is having difficulty completing the
9 demand letter that also is due to be served today due to a key executive traveling outside the
10 country, and proposed a one-day extension applicable to both the demand letter and the
11 defendants’ response;
12
WHEREAS, defendants have agreed to this proposal;
13
WHEREAS, the proposed extension does not require extension or other modification of
14 the currently scheduled mediation on December 15, 2011;
15
ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree and propose that Judge Laporte extend the deadline for
16 Plantronics to serve its demand letter and for defendants’ written response from the current dates
17 of December 6, 2011 and December 12, 2011, respectively, to December 7, 2011 and December
18 13, 2011, respectively:
19 IT IS SO STIPULATED:
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR DEMAND LETTER
Case3:09-cv-01714-BZ Document162
1 Dated: December 6, 2011
Filed12/06/11 Page3 of 4
CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS
2
3
By:
4
5
6 Dated: December 6, 2011
7
/s/David C. Bohrer
David C. Bohrer
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PLANTRONICS, INC.
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
LLP
8
9
10
By:
/s/Gabriel S. Gross
Gabriel S. Gross
Attorneys for Defendants
ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR DEMAND LETTER
Case3:09-cv-01714-BZ Document162
1
Filed12/06/11 Page4 of 4
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
2
3
7
DATED: December___, 2011
4
Hon. Elizabeth Laporte
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
I, David C. Bohrer, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to
12
file this document. Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Gabriel Gross, counsel
13
for Defendant, has concurred in this filing.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 09-01714 BZ
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DATE FOR DEMAND LETTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?