Plantronics, Inc. v. ALIPH, INC. et al
Filing
214
Stipulation and Order Granting Certain Electronic Equipment and Materials Into the Courthouse by Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman granting 213 Stipulation (bzsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2012)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
& SULLIVAN, LLP
2
Robert P. Feldman (Bar No. 69602)
bobfeldman@quinnemanuel.com
3
Gabriel S. Gross (Bar No. 254672)
gabegross@quinnemanuel.com
4
Michelle G. Lee (Bar No. 266167)
michellelee@quinnemanuel.com
5
Dane W. Reinstedt (Bar No. 275447)
danereinstedt@quinnemanuel.com
6 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
7 Telephone:
(650) 801-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 801-5100
8
Attorneys for Defendants Aliph, Inc. and
9 Aliphcom, Inc.
CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS
David C. Bohrer (Bar No. 212397)
dbohrer@confluencelaw.com
Jessie J. Ho (Bar No. 260790)
jho@confluencelaw.com
60 South Market Street, Suite 1400
San Jose, California 95113-2396
Telephone:
(408) 938-3882
Facsimile:
(408) 971-4332
10
CONNOLLY BOVE LODGE & HUTZ LLP
Bruce G. Chapman (Bar No. 164258)
bchapman@cblh.com
Elizabeth Yang (Bar No. 249713)
eyang@cblh.com
333 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 2300
Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone:
(213) 787-2500
Facsimile:
(213) 687-0498
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff Plantronics, Inc.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
18
CASE NO. 09-cv-01714-BZ
19 PLANTRONICS, INC.,
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SEEKING TO BRING
CERTAIN ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
AND MATERIALS INTO THE
COURTHOUSE
20
21
Plaintiff,
v.
22 ALIPH, INC. AND ALIPHCOM, INC.,
23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
04009.51806/4656267.1
Case No. 09-cv-01714-BZ
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and General Order No. 58, the parties, by and through their
2 counsel, hereby submit the following stipulation and proposed order.
3
WHEREAS, hearings are set in the above captioned matter on Wednesday, March 21,
4 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in the courtroom of U.S. Magistrate Judge Bernard Zimmerman, Courtroom C
5 on the 15th Floor of the federal courthouse located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco,
6 California 94102;
7
WHEREAS, the parties desire to bring certain electronic equipment and materials into the
8 courtroom for use in the hearings;
9
ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree and request permission to bring certain electronic
10 equipment and materials into the courtroom and to access Courtroom C after 3:00 p.m. on March
11 20, 2012 to set up electronic equipment and other materials.
12
The electronic equipment and other materials will likely include:
13
1.
projectors;
14
2.
projector screen (approximately 7-8 feet);
15
3.
laptops;
16
4.
flat-panel monitors;
17
5.
video switchers;
18
6.
electrical cables, connections, power strips, and extension cords, and other
19 connective cables;
20
7.
speakers; and
21
8.
ELMO document camera.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
04009.51806/4656267.1
-1-
Case No. 09-cv-01714-BZ
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
3 DATED: March 15, 2012
4
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
5
By /s/ Gabriel S. Gross
Robert P. Feldman
Gabriel S. Gross
Michelle G. Lee
Dane W. Reinstedt
Attorneys for Defendants
ALIPH, INC., and ALIPHCOM, INC.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12 DATED: March 15, 2012
CONFLUENCE LAW PARTNERS
13
14
By /s/ David C. Bohrer
David C. Bohrer
Jessie J. Ho
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PLANTRONICS, INC.
15
16
17
18
19
20
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
16
Date: March __, 2012
______________________________
Hon. Judge Bernard Zimmerman
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
I, Dane W. Reinstedt, am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used
26 to file this document. Pursuant to General Order 45.X.B, I hereby attest that Gabriel Gross,
27 counsel for Defendant, and David Bohrer, counsel for Plaintiff, have concurred in this filing.
28
04009.51806/4656267.1
-2-
Case No. 09-cv-01714-BZ
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?