Plantronics, Inc. v. ALIPH, INC. et al
Filing
309
ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM COSTS JUDGMENT by Hon. William Alsup granting 305 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2013)
1 David C. Bohrer (Bar No. 212397)
David.bohrer@valoremlaw.com
2 VALOREM LAW GROUP, LLP
60 South Market Street, Suite 1400
3 San Jose, California 95113-2396
Telephone: (408) 938-3882
4 Facsimile: (408) 915-2672
5 Pat Heptig (Bar No. 00793940) , Of Counsel
Pat.heptig@valoremlaw.com
6 (admitted pro hac vice pending)
VALOREM LAW GROUP, LLP
7 15050 E. Beltwood Pkwy.
Addison, Texas 75001
8 Telephone: (214) 451-2154
Facsimile: (312) 676-5499
9
Patrick Lamb (Bar No. 6182882)
10
Patrick.lamb@valoremlaw.com
(admitted pro hac vice pending)
11 VALOREM LAW GROUP, LLP
35 East Wacker Drive, Suite 3000
12 Chicago, Illinois 60601
Telephone: (312) 676-5477
13 Facsimile: (312) 676-5499
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Robert P. Feldman (Bar No. 69602)
bobfeldman@quinnemanuel.com
Dane W. Reinstedt (Bar No. 275447)
danereinstedt@quinnemanuel.com
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
Telephone:
(650) 801-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 801-5100
Attorneys for Defendants ALIPH, INC.
AND ALIPHCOM, INC.
14 Attorneys for Plaintiff
PLANTRONICS, INC.
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
18
19 PLANTRONICS, INC.,
20
Plaintiff,
21
v.
22
Case No. C 09-01714 WHA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM
COSTS JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO
RULE 60(b)(5)
23 ALIPH, INC. and ALIPHCOM, INC.,
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
Case No. C 09-01714 (WHA)
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER: TO SCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5) and Civil Local Rule 7-12, plaintiff
2 Plantronics, Inc. (“Plantronics”) and defendants Aliph, Inc. and Aliphcom, Inc. (“Aliph”), by and
3 through their counsel, hereby submit the following stipulation and proposed order.
4
WHEREAS, the District Court granted summary judgment in Aliph’s favor and ordered
5 that Aliph recover costs from Plantronics (D.N. 221);
6
WHEREAS, an order taxing costs in the amount of $93,929.16 was entered on October 23,
7 2012 (D.N. 264);
8
WHEREAS, the Federal Circuit reversed in part and vacated in part the District Court’s
9 judgment and remanded the case to the District Court for further proceedings (D.N. 266);
10
ACCORDINGLY, the parties agree and request, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
11 Procedure 60(b)(5), that the Court enter an order relieving Plantronics of the judgment for costs in
12 the amount of $93,929.16 (D.N. 221 and 264) and otherwise vacating the orders (D.N. 221 and
13 264) in all respects.
14
//
15
//
16
17
//
18
//
19
//
20
//
21
22
//
23
//
24
//
25
//
26
27
//
28
-1Case No. C 09-01714 (WHA)
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER: TO SCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
2 Dated: December 16, 2013
VALOREM LAW GROUP, LLP
3
4
By: /s/ David C. Bohrer
David C. Bohrer
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PLANTRONICS, INC
5
6
7 Dated: December 16, 2013
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
LLP
8
9
By: /s/ Robert P. Feldman
Robert P. Feldman
Attorneys for Defendants
ALIPH, INC. AND ALIPHCOM, INC.
10
11
12
13 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
R NIA
FO
LI
ER
H
20
RT
19
Hon. William Alsup Alsup
illiam
United States District Judge
Judge W
NO
18
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
A
17
UNIT
ED
16
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
__,
15 DATED: December 17 2013
S
14
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2Case No. C 09-01714 (WHA)
STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER: TO SCHEDULE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?