Plantronics, Inc. v. ALIPH, INC. et al

Filing 314

ORDER RE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSIVE SEALING DECLARATION AND EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSIVE DECLARATION by Hon. William Alsup re 312 Motion for Leave to File.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/23/2013)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8

PLANTRONICS, INC.,

9

Plaintiff,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 09-01714 WHA

v.
ALIPH, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
/

ORDER RE MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSIVE
SEALING DECLARATION AND
EXTENDING DEADLINE TO
FILE RESPONSIVE
DECLARATION

13
14

A December 19 order denied defendants’ administrative motion to file under seal three

15

exhibits. No declaration could have changed this decision. The order stated “Defendants may

16

file an administrative motion for leave to file under seal narrowly tailored redactions in

17

accordance with governing case law (and with an appropriate declaration) for Exhibits A, B, and

18

C by December 24 at noon.” The order also noted that both sides have now had an opportunity

19

to revise sealing motions — parties are not entitled to this. A December 5 order provided

20

Plantronics a second chance. The December 19 order provided defendants a second chance.

21

Plantronics now moves for leave to file a responsive declaration to the motion defendants

22

are permitted to file by December 24. This request is unnecessary. Local Rule 79-5(e) provides

23

the procedure for opposing parties and non-parties to file declarations. Holidays are not a good

24

excuse to extend Plantronics’ deadline. If Plantronics intends to file a declaration, perhaps the

25

parties could meet and confer regarding a joint motion to seal.

26

IT IS SO ORDERED.

27
28

Dated: December 23, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE