Plantronics, Inc. v. ALIPH, INC. et al

Filing 319

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL by Hon. William Alsup granting 317 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2013)

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Robert P. Feldman (Bar No. 69602)
[e-mail]
2
Dane W. Reinstedt (Bar No. 275447)
[e-mail]
3 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
4 Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
5
John M. Neukom (Bar No. 275887)
6
[e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
7
San Francisco, California 94111
[phone]
8 Telephone:
Facsimile:
[phone]
9
Attorneys for Defendants Aliph, Inc. and
10 Aliphcom, Inc.
1

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16 PLANTRONICS, INC.,
Plaintiff,

17
18

vs.

19 ALIPH, INC. AND ALIPHCOM, INC.,
20
21

Defendants.

CASE NO. 09-cv-01714-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ALIPH, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER
SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF
OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:

January 9, 2013
8:00 a.m.
8, 19th Floor
Hon. William Alsup

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 09-cv-01714-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ALIPH’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

Now before the Court is Defendant Aliph, Inc.’s Administrative Motion for Leave to File

3 Documents Under Seal. Upon consideration of the motion and the supporting declaration of Dane
4 W. Reinstedt filed therewith, the Court finds there to be good cause for granting Aliph’s request to
5 file documents under seal.
6

GOOD CAUSE having been shown, the Court finds that:

7

1.

The parties possess overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of

8 public access to the record in the following documents or portions thereof:
9

16
17
18
19
20
21

Reinstedt Declaration ISO Opposition to
Motion in Limine)
2.

The parties’ confidentiality interests support sealing the records.

3.

A substantial probability exists that the parties’ overriding confidentiality interests

will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed as requested;
4.

The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored and no less-restrictive means exist to

achieve this overriding interest.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23 DATED: December 27, 2013.
24

28

VED
APPRO

ER

H

27

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

Hon. William Alsup
United States District Judge
up
iam Als
dge Will
Ju

RT

26

NO

25

Redacted Portions

RT
U
O

22

Requested Seal Doc. No. 2 (Exhibit C to

R NIA

15

Motion in Limine)

FO

14

Reinstedt Declaration ISO Opposition to

LI

13

Redacted Portions

A

12

Requested Seal Doc. No. 1 (Exhibit A to

S

11

Portion to be Sealed

UNIT
ED

10

Document

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

-1Case No. 09-cv-01714-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ALIPH’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL