Plantronics, Inc. v. ALIPH, INC. et al

Filing 319

ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL by Hon. William Alsup granting 317 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2013)

Download PDF
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Robert P. Feldman (Bar No. 69602) bobfeldman@quinnemanuel.com 2 Dane W. Reinstedt (Bar No. 275447) danereinstedt@quinnemanuel.com 3 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 4 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 5 John M. Neukom (Bar No. 275887) 6 johnneukom@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 7 San Francisco, California 94111 (415) 875-6600 8 Telephone: Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 9 Attorneys for Defendants Aliph, Inc. and 10 Aliphcom, Inc. 1 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 PLANTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff, 17 18 vs. 19 ALIPH, INC. AND ALIPHCOM, INC., 20 21 Defendants. CASE NO. 09-cv-01714-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ALIPH, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO MOTION IN LIMINE Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: January 9, 2013 8:00 a.m. 8, 19th Floor Hon. William Alsup 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 09-cv-01714-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ALIPH’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Now before the Court is Defendant Aliph, Inc.’s Administrative Motion for Leave to File 3 Documents Under Seal. Upon consideration of the motion and the supporting declaration of Dane 4 W. Reinstedt filed therewith, the Court finds there to be good cause for granting Aliph’s request to 5 file documents under seal. 6 GOOD CAUSE having been shown, the Court finds that: 7 1. The parties possess overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of 8 public access to the record in the following documents or portions thereof: 9 16 17 18 19 20 21 Reinstedt Declaration ISO Opposition to Motion in Limine) 2. The parties’ confidentiality interests support sealing the records. 3. A substantial probability exists that the parties’ overriding confidentiality interests will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed as requested; 4. The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored and no less-restrictive means exist to achieve this overriding interest. IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 DATED: December 27, 2013. 24 28 VED APPRO ER H 27 S DISTRICT TE C TA Hon. William Alsup United States District Judge up iam Als dge Will Ju RT 26 NO 25 Redacted Portions RT U O 22 Requested Seal Doc. No. 2 (Exhibit C to R NIA 15 Motion in Limine) FO 14 Reinstedt Declaration ISO Opposition to LI 13 Redacted Portions A 12 Requested Seal Doc. No. 1 (Exhibit A to S 11 Portion to be Sealed UNIT ED 10 Document N F D IS T IC T O R C -1Case No. 09-cv-01714-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ALIPH’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?