Plantronics, Inc. v. ALIPH, INC. et al
Filing
349
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL (DKT. NO. 337) by Judge Alsup granting in part and denying in part 337 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part 338 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part 339 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part 340 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2014)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
PLANTRONICS, INC.,
9
Plaintiff,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
No. C 09-01714 WHA
v.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SEAL
(DKT. NO. 337)
ALIPH, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
/
13
14
On January 25, Plantronics, Inc. filed an administrative motion for leave to file under
15
seal 38 exhibits in their entirety and proposed redactions to its opposition to Aliph’s motion to
16
strike damages expert reports of Dr. Lynde and Mr. Napper (Dkt. No. 337). On January 31,
17
defendants filed a supporting declaration stating “Aliph does not seek sealing of Exhibits A-E,
18
G-U, W-Z, EE-RR.” Accordingly, the request to seal Exhibits A, B, E, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, O, P,
19
Q, R, S, T, U, W, X, Y, Z, EE, FF, GG, HH, II, JJ, MM, NN, PP, WW, and RR is DENIED. The
20
request to seal Exhibits F, V, AA, BB, CC, and DD is GRANTED. The request to seal the
21
proposed redactions in Plantronics’ opposition is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.
22
Aliph’s proposed redactions on pages 5 and 6 are granted (Dkt. No. 346-1). Plantronics’
23
proposed redactions in yellow on pages 20–23 are granted. The remainder of the proposed
24
redactions shall not be sealed. Plantronics shall re-file its opposition and exhibits in accordance
25
with this order by NOON ON FEBRUARY 7.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 3, 2014.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?