Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. DDR Incorporated

Filing 7

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2009)

Case 3:09-cv-01724-WHA

Document 6

Filed 05/18/2009

Page 1 of 2

1 Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607) Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 [phone] 4 [phone] ­ Facsimile [e-mail] 5 [e-mail] 6 Brian Davis, Esq. (SBN 160817) HAYES DAVIS BONINO ELLINGSON 7 McLAY & SCOTT, LLP 203 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 480 8 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 [phone] 9 [phone] ­ Facsimile [e-mail] 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: C09-1724 WHA STIPULATION FOR 45-DAY EXTENSION TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

14 BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS PENSION TRUST FUND, et al., 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 DDR INCORPORATED, aka DDR INC., 18 19 20 21 Defendant.

The parties to this action hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Plaintiffs BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS PENSION TRUST FUND, et

22 al. ("Painters Trust Funds"), filed this action against DDR INCORPORATED, aka DDR INC., 23 ("DDR Inc.") on April 21, 2009. 24 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 ///
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Case No.: C09-1724 WHA
P:\CLIENTS\PATCL\DDR, Inc\Pleadings\C09-1724 WHA Stipulation to Extend Time 051409.doc

2.

Service on Defendants was completed on April 30, 2009.

-1-

Case 3:09-cv-01724-WHA

Document 6

Filed 05/18/2009

Page 2 of 2

1

3.

The parties have conferred and, in accordance with Local Rule 6-1(a), hereby

2 stipulate to a 45-day extension for Defendant to file an Answer to the Complaint. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Case No.: C09-1724 WHA
P:\CLIENTS\PATCL\DDR, Inc\Pleadings\C09-1724 WHA Stipulation to Extend Time 051409.doc

Dated: May 18, 2009

SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION

Michele R. Stafford /S/ Michele R. Stafford Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Dated: May 18, 2009

HAYES DAVIS BONINO ELLINGSON McLAY & SCOTT, LLP

S DISTRICT TE C A ORDER T

Brian Davis /S/ Brian Davis Attorneys for Defendant

RT U O

It is hereby ordered that Defendant has been granted a 45 day extension to answer the ERED Dated: May 20, 2009 _____________________________________ lsup illiam A udge W J UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

UNIT ED

S

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

A

C

LI

FO

R NIA

Complaint filed in this matter.

O IT IS S

ORD

NO

RT

H

-2-