Mosley v. Wong

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER concerning further briefing schedule and continuing stay. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 02/01/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

DAVID W. SHAPIRO (219265)
KIERAN P. RINGGENBERG (208600)
ALEXIS J. LOEB (269895)
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
PHILLIP J. LINDSAY
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
AMANDA J. MURRAY (223829)
Deputy Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Attorneys for Petitioner Ron Mosley

Attorneys for Respondent Michael Martel

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

14

RON MOSLEY

15
16
17

Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL MARTEL,

18

Respondent.

19
20
21

RON MOSLEY
Petitioner,

22
23
24
25
26

v.
MICHAEL MARTEL,
Respondent.

) NO. C09-1749 TEH
)
)
) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
) NO. C10-4907 TEH
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

Pursuant to the Court’s July 14, 2011 Order Staying Cases (Case No. C09-1749

2
3

TEH (Dkt #17) and Case No. C10-4907 TEH (Dkt #11)), Petitioner Ron Mosley and

4

Respondent Michael Martel (together, the “Parties”) jointly submit this stipulation

5

concerning further briefing in the above-captioned matters.

6

WHEREAS, the Court’s Order of July 14, 2011 stayed the above-captioned matters

7

and required the parties to file stipulated briefing schedules within 14 days of the issuance

8

of the mandate in Mosley’s Ninth Circuit Appeal challenging his 2005 denial of parole,

9

Mosley v. Oroski, Nos. 08-15327 and 08-15389 (“Ninth Circuit Appeal”);
WHEREAS, the mandate in Mosley’s Ninth Circuit Appeal issued on January 18,

10
11
12

2012;
WHEREAS, Respondent has agreed that Mosley shall remain released on bail

13

pending the decision of a not-in-custody parole hearing scheduled for February 23, 2012;

14

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties, through their

15

respective counsel of record, that within fourteen days of the decision in Mosley’s

16

February 23, 2012 not-in-custody parole hearing, the parties shall meet and confer and file

17

stipulated briefing schedules in these cases or, alternatively, stipulations to dismiss on

18

mootness or other grounds.

19
20

Dated: February 1, 2012.

21

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

22

By: /s/ Alexis J. Loeb

By: /s/ Amanda J. Murray

23

DAVID W. SHAPIRO (No. 219265)
[e-mail]
KIERAN P. RINGGENBERG (No. 208600)
[e-mail]
ALEXIS J. LOEB (No. 269895)
[e-mail]
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP

KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
PHILLIP J. LINDSAY
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
AMANDA J. MURRAY (No. 223829)
Deputy Attorney General

24
25
26
27
28

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories.
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3

Having considered the parties’ February 1, 2012 stipulation, and for good cause

4

shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned matters shall remain stayed

5

pending a decision following Petitioner Mosley’s February 23, 2012 not-in-custody parole

6

hearing. Within fourteen days of a decision following the not-in-custody hearing, the

7

parties shall submit a stipulation setting a schedule for further briefing or dismissing the

8

above-captioned matters.

16

R NIA

FO

LI

ER

H

15

He
elton E.

h
Judge T

RT

14

nd

NO

13

_____________________________________
THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICTrCOURT
e son

A

12

02/01
Dated: ____________, 2012

UNIT
ED

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

10

S

9

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

C