Mosley v. Wong

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Further Briefing and Continuing Stay. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 03/08/2012. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DAVID W. SHAPIRO (219265) KIERAN P. RINGGENBERG (208600) ALEXIS J. LOEB (269895) BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900 Oakland, CA 94612 Telephone: (510) 874-1000 Facsimile: (510) 874-1460 Email: dshapiro@bsfllp.com kringgenberg@bsfllp.com aloeb@bsfllp.com KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California PHILLIP LINDSAY Supervising Deputy Attorney General AMANDA J. MURRAY (223829) Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5741 Facsimile: (415) 703-5843 Email: Amanda.Murray@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Petitioner Ron Mosley Attorneys for Respondent Michael Martel 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 RON MOSLEY 15 16 17 Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, 18 Respondent. 19 20 21 RON MOSLEY Petitioner, 22 23 24 25 26 v. MICHAEL MARTEL, Respondent. ) NO. C09-1749 TEH ) ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. C10-4907 TEH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the Court’s July 14, 2011 Order Staying Cases (Dkt #17 (N.D. Cal. Case 1 2 No. C09-1749 TEH); Dkt #11 (N.D. Cal. Case No. C10-4907 TEH)), Petitioner Ron Mosley 3 and Respondent Michael Martel (together, the “Parties”) jointly submit this stipulation 4 concerning further briefing in the above-captioned matters. 5 WHEREAS, the Court’s Order of July 14, 2011 stayed the above-captioned matters 6 and required the parties to file stipulated briefing schedules within 14 days of the issuance 7 of the mandate in Mosley’s Ninth Circuit Appeal challenging his 2005 denial of parole, 8 Mosley v. Oroski, Nos. 08-15327 and 08-15389 (“Ninth Circuit Appeal”); WHEREAS, the mandate in Mosley’s Ninth Circuit Appeal issued on January 18, 9 10 2012; 11 WHEREAS, Respondent agreed that Mosley would remain released on bail 12 pending the decision of a not-in-custody parole hearing scheduled for February 23, 2012; WHEREAS the Board of Parole Hearings (“Board”) found Mosley suitable for 13 14 parole at the February 23, 2012 not-in-custody hearing, and Mr. Mosley thus remains on 15 release; and WHEREAS the Board’s decision shall become final on June 22, 2012, pursuant to 16 17 California Penal Code § 3041(b); WHEREAS, if the Board’s decision to grant Mr. Mosley parole becomes final, the 18 19 Governor shall have until July 23, 2012 to review the Board’s decision, pursuant to 20 California Penal Code § 3041.2; 21 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the Parties, through their 22 respective counsel of record, that by August 3, 2012, the parties shall meet and confer and 23 file stipulated briefing schedules in these cases or, alternatively, stipulations to dismiss on 24 mootness or other grounds. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Dated: March 8, 2012 2 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 3 4 5 6 7 By: /s/ By: /s/ DAVID W. SHAPIRO (No. 219265) dshapiro@bsfllp.com KIERAN P. RINGGENBERG (No. 208600) kringgenberg@bsfllp.com ALEXIS J. LOEB (No. 269895) aloeb@bsfllp.com BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California PHILLIP LINDSAY Supervising Deputy Attorney General AMANDA J. MURRAY (No. 223829) Deputy Attorney General 8 9 10 Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X-B, the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 Having considered the parties’ March 8, 2012 stipulation, and for good cause 3 shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned matters shall remain stayed. By 4 August 3, 2012, the parties shall submit a stipulation setting a schedule for further 5 briefing or dismissing the above-captioned matters. S R NIA ER H 12 FO Judge T RT 11 NO 10 _____________________________________ THELTON E. HENDERSON, JUDGE rson . Hende UNITED STATESoDISTRICT COURT helt n E LI 9 03/08 Dated: ____________, 2012 A 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 7 RT U O 6 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?