Abudiab v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
192
ORDER GRANTING 191 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DEADLINES re 185 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 3/19/2012. Replies due by 4/2/2012. Motion Hearing set for 5/4/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/12/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2012)
Case3:09-cv-01778-JSW Document191 Filed03/09/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
Joseph S. May SBN 245924
LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH S. MAY
22 Battery Street, Suite 810
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone (415) 781-3333
Facsimile (415) 398-1410
joseph@josephmaylaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
AMJAD ABUDIAB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
AMJAD ABUDIAB,
CASE NO.: C09-1778-JSW
9
10
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO; ELIAS GEORGOPOULOS;
ANTONIO PARRA; and DOES 1-20,
inclusive.
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR
OPPOSITION PAPERS AND REPLY
PAPERS RELATED TO DEFENDANT
PARRA’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
15
Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:
16
Action filed:
Trial Date:
14
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendants.
April 6, 2011
9:00 a.m.
Courtroom 11, 19th Floor
Hon. Jeffrey S. White
March 27, 2009
July 9, 2012
The Parties, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:
1. With leave of Court, Defendant Antonio Parra filed a summary judgment motion on
February 27, 2012, which is set for hearing on April 6, 2012. Pursuant to the Local Rules,
opposing papers are currently due March 12, 2012, and reply papers are due one week from the
date the opposition is filed and served. See L.R. 7-3(a), (c). Due to the press of business, and
other matters that have affected these deadlines, including a month-long trial in which counsel
for both parties were engaged throughout the month of January and the fact that the deposition of
Capt. Parra did not take place until late February 2012, Plaintiff has sought this stipulation from
defense counsel, and defense counsel agrees and stipulates to continue Plaintiff’s deadline for his
opposition to the pending motion to March 19, 2012.
2. Defense counsel, who had planned his schedule around the currently set dates for
opposition and reply papers, already has other matters scheduled for the week Defendant Parra’s
1
C09-1778-JSW
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MSJ OPPOSITION AND REPLY
Case3:09-cv-01778-JSW Document191 Filed03/09/12 Page2 of 3
1
reply would be due if the dates we only moved one week. Therefore the parties further stipulate
2
that if the Court extends the deadline for Plaintiff’s opposition to March 19, 2012, the deadline
3
for Defendant Parra’s reply may be continued to April 2, 2012.
4
3. If the Court grants the deadline extensions stipulated to above, the Parties understand
5
that a brief continuance of the hearing on this motion will likely be necessary and the Parties are
6
both amenable to such a continuance.
7
8
So Stipulated.
9
DATED: March 9, 2012
LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH S. MAY
10
/s/ Joseph S. May
____________________________________
Joseph S. May, attorney for Plaintiff,
Amjad Abudiab
11
12
13
So Stipulated.
14
Dated: March 9, 2012
15
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
JOANNE HOEPER
17
Chief Trial Deputy
BLAKE P. LOEBS
Deputy City Attorney
18
/s/ Blake P. Loebs*
By:________________________________
19
BLAKE P. LOEBS
16
Attorneys for Defendants
20
*Pursuant to General Order 45, §O.K., the
filer of this document attests that he has
received the concurrence of this signatory to
file this document.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, it is HEREBY
ORDERED,
1. The deadline for Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant Parra’s motion for summary
judgment shall be continued from March 12, 2012 to March 19, 2012.
2
C09-1778-JSW
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MSJ OPPOSITION AND REPLY
Case3:09-cv-01778-JSW Document191 Filed03/09/12 Page3 of 3
1
2
3
2. The deadline for Defendant Parra’s reply to Plaintiff’s opposition shall be continued to
April 2, 2012.
[3. The hearing on Defendant Parra’s motion for summary judgment shall be continued
4
9:00
May 4,
from April 6, 2012 to_____________________, 2012, at ___________am/pm, in Courtroom 11,
5
19th Floor.]
6
7
It is so ordered.
8
9
10
11
March 12, 2012
DATED: _________________
___________________________________
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
C09-1778-JSW
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MSJ OPPOSITION AND REPLY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?