Abudiab v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 192

ORDER GRANTING 191 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION AND REPLY DEADLINES re 185 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 3/19/2012. Replies due by 4/2/2012. Motion Hearing set for 5/4/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Jeffrey S. White.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 3/12/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-01778-JSW Document191 Filed03/09/12 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 Joseph S. May SBN 245924 LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH S. MAY 22 Battery Street, Suite 810 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone (415) 781-3333 Facsimile (415) 398-1410 joseph@josephmaylaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff AMJAD ABUDIAB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 AMJAD ABUDIAB, CASE NO.: C09-1778-JSW 9 10 11 12 13 Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; ELIAS GEORGOPOULOS; ANTONIO PARRA; and DOES 1-20, inclusive. STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES FOR OPPOSITION PAPERS AND REPLY PAPERS RELATED TO DEFENDANT PARRA’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 15 Date: Time: Place: Judge: 16 Action filed: Trial Date: 14 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. April 6, 2011 9:00 a.m. Courtroom 11, 19th Floor Hon. Jeffrey S. White March 27, 2009 July 9, 2012 The Parties, through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 1. With leave of Court, Defendant Antonio Parra filed a summary judgment motion on February 27, 2012, which is set for hearing on April 6, 2012. Pursuant to the Local Rules, opposing papers are currently due March 12, 2012, and reply papers are due one week from the date the opposition is filed and served. See L.R. 7-3(a), (c). Due to the press of business, and other matters that have affected these deadlines, including a month-long trial in which counsel for both parties were engaged throughout the month of January and the fact that the deposition of Capt. Parra did not take place until late February 2012, Plaintiff has sought this stipulation from defense counsel, and defense counsel agrees and stipulates to continue Plaintiff’s deadline for his opposition to the pending motion to March 19, 2012. 2. Defense counsel, who had planned his schedule around the currently set dates for opposition and reply papers, already has other matters scheduled for the week Defendant Parra’s 1 C09-1778-JSW STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MSJ OPPOSITION AND REPLY Case3:09-cv-01778-JSW Document191 Filed03/09/12 Page2 of 3 1 reply would be due if the dates we only moved one week. Therefore the parties further stipulate 2 that if the Court extends the deadline for Plaintiff’s opposition to March 19, 2012, the deadline 3 for Defendant Parra’s reply may be continued to April 2, 2012. 4 3. If the Court grants the deadline extensions stipulated to above, the Parties understand 5 that a brief continuance of the hearing on this motion will likely be necessary and the Parties are 6 both amenable to such a continuance. 7 8 So Stipulated. 9 DATED: March 9, 2012 LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH S. MAY 10 /s/ Joseph S. May ____________________________________ Joseph S. May, attorney for Plaintiff, Amjad Abudiab 11 12 13 So Stipulated. 14 Dated: March 9, 2012 15 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER 17 Chief Trial Deputy BLAKE P. LOEBS Deputy City Attorney 18 /s/ Blake P. Loebs* By:________________________________ 19 BLAKE P. LOEBS 16 Attorneys for Defendants 20 *Pursuant to General Order 45, §O.K., the filer of this document attests that he has received the concurrence of this signatory to file this document. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, it is HEREBY ORDERED, 1. The deadline for Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant Parra’s motion for summary judgment shall be continued from March 12, 2012 to March 19, 2012. 2 C09-1778-JSW STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MSJ OPPOSITION AND REPLY Case3:09-cv-01778-JSW Document191 Filed03/09/12 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 2. The deadline for Defendant Parra’s reply to Plaintiff’s opposition shall be continued to April 2, 2012. [3. The hearing on Defendant Parra’s motion for summary judgment shall be continued 4 9:00 May 4, from April 6, 2012 to_____________________, 2012, at ___________am/pm, in Courtroom 11, 5 19th Floor.] 6 7 It is so ordered. 8 9 10 11 March 12, 2012 DATED: _________________ ___________________________________ HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 C09-1778-JSW STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR MSJ OPPOSITION AND REPLY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?