Abudiab v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 71

STIPULATION AND ORDER: Case referred to mediation; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 11/24/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/24/2010)

Download PDF
Abudiab v. City and County of San Francisco et al Doc. 71 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Joseph S. May SBN 245924 LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH S. MAY 22 Battery Street, Suite 810 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone (415) 781-3333 Facsimile (415) 398-1410 joseph@josephmaylaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff AMJAD ABUDIAB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION AMJAD ABUDIAB, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO; ELIAS GEORGOPOULOS; ANTONIO PARRA; and DOES 1-20, inclusive. Defendants. STIPULATION 1. The Parties participated in a settlement conference held by Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen on June 4, 2010; however, the case did not settle. 2. At the November 15, 2010 Case Management Conference, the Parties agreed to submit the case to one more form of ADR prior to trial. Soon thereafter, the Court assigned the case to Magistrate Judge Chen for a Settlement Conference and ordered the parties to participate in an ADR conference to decide upon which ADR process in which they would agree to engage. 3. On November 23, 2010 attorneys for the parties participated in a telephonic conference with the Court's ADR unit. Counsel agreed that as long as only one further ADR session would be required, the parties would submit the matter to Court-sponsored mediation. CASE NO.: C09-1778-MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SUBMIT CASE TO COURTSPONSORED MEDIATION Trial Date: June 14, 2011 Action Filed: March 23, 2009 C09-1778-MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION AND VACATING REFERRAL TO SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. The Parties therefore stipulate that the case should be submitted to Court-sponsored mediation and that, regardless of the outcome, no further Settlement Conferences or other forms of ADR should be required of the parties unless upon mutual consent of the Parties. The Parties jointly and respectfully request an order from the Court referring this matter to Court-sponsored mediation, preferably with mediator Martin Dodd (or, if he is unavailable, with any available mediator), to be completed by January 31, 2011, and vacating the order referring the matter to an additional Settlement Conference with Magistrate Judge Chen. So Stipulated. DATED: November 23, 2010 LAW OFFICE OF JOSEPH S. MAY ____________________________________ JOSEPH S. MAY, Attorney for Plaintiff, AMJAD ABUDIAB So Stipulated. Dated: November 23, 2010 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER Chief Trial Deputy BLAKE P. LOEBS Deputy City Attorney By:________________________________ BLAKE P. LOEBS Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al. Pursuant to General Order 45, žO.K., the filer of this document attests that he has received the concurrence of this signatory to file this document. C09-1778-MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION AND VACATING REFERRAL TO SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11/24/2010 DATED: _________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the case is referred to Court-sponsored mediation, to be completed by January 31, 2011. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the November 16, 2010 Order referring the case to Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen for a Settlement Conference is vacated, and that following the Court-sponsored mediation, the Parties will not be obligated to participate in any further ADR sessions. UNIT ED S S DISTRICT TE C TA ER N D IS T IC T R OF C09-1778-MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION AND VACATING REFERRAL TO SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 3 A C LI FO ___________________________________ MARILYN HALL PATEL l United States DistrictnCourtaJudge H. P te Marily Judge R NIA O OR IT IS S DERED RT U O NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?