Seielstad v. Aegis Senior Communities LLC et al
Filing
98
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS- AND COLLECTIVE-ACTION SETTLEMENT. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 17, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Alan Harris (SBN 146079)
David Zelenski (SBN 231768)
HARRIS & RUBLE
6424 Santa Monica Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90038
Telephone: 323.962.3777
Facsimile: 323.962.3004
aharris@harrisandruble.com
atreanor@harrisandruble.com
David S. Harris (SBN 215224)
NORTH BAY LAW GROUP
116 East Blithedale Avenue, Suite 2
Mill Valley, California 94941
Telephone: 415.388.8788
Facsimile: 415.388.8770
dsh@northbaylawgroup.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
TAMARAH R. SEIELSTAD, individually Case No. 09-01797 MMC
and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS- AND
Plaintiff,
COLLECTIVE-ACTION
SETTLEMENT
v.
Assigned to Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
AEGIS SENIOR COMMUNITIES, LLC,
Defendant.
19
20
KENNYON MORRIS, et al.,
21
22
23
24
25
Case No. 10-2060 MMC
Assigned to Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
Plaintiffs,
v.
AEGIS SENIOR COMMUNITIES, LLC,
Defendant.
Date: September 30, 2011
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Place: Courtroom 7, 450 Golden Gate
Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
1
This matter came before the Court for hearing on September 30, 2011, pursuant to
2
the April 15, 2011, Order Preliminarily Approving Class- and Collective-Action
3
Settlement, Conditionally Certifying Settlement Class, Approving Form of Notice, and
4
Scheduling a Fairness Hearing (“Preliminary Approval Order”). Due and adequate notice
5
having been given to the Classes as defined in and required by the Preliminary Approval
6
Order, the Court having considered all papers filed and otherwise being fully informed,
7
and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
8
9
10
11
1.
All capitalized terms used herein (unless otherwise indicated) shall have the
same meaning as defined in the Joint Stipulation and Settlement Agreement and Release
of Claims (“Settlement” or “Settlement Agreement”).
2.
The two Settlement Classes conditionally certified in the Preliminary
12
Approval Order are confirmed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 and to 29
13
U.S.C. § 216(b). Specifically, Settlement Class A consists of all current and former non-
14
exempt, hourly paid California employees of Defendant performing care-manager duties
15
in the position of lead care manager, care manager, medical care manager, and medical
16
technician from April 24, 2005, to and including April 15, 2011; Settlement Class B
17
consists of all former California employees of Defendant who were terminated from
18
Defendant’s employment between the time period April 24, 2005, to and including April
19
15, 2011.
20
3.
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of each of the claims
21
asserted in the operative Complaints in the above-captioned actions, as well as personal
22
jurisdiction over the parties to those actions, including the Settlement Class Members.
23
4.
Notice to the Settlement Class, including both (a) the mailing of the Class
24
Notice and Claim Form as set forth in the Settlement and (b) the establishment of a
25
website by the Claims Administrator, has been completed in conformity with the
26
Preliminary Approval Order. The Court finds that this notice was the best notice
27
practicable under the circumstances, that it provided due and adequate notice of the
28
proceedings and of the matters set forth therein, and that it fully satisfies the requirements
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
1
of law and due process. The Court bases this finding, in part, on the Claims
2
Administrator’s extensive efforts not only in initially mailing Class Notice and Claim
3
Forms to Class Members, but in re-mailing undelivered Class Notices and Claim Forms
4
to Class Members, utilizing a third-party locator service to update Class Members’
5
addresses, receiving and responding to telephone calls from inquiring Class Members,
6
and maintaining the website containing information about the case.
7
5.
The Court hereby approves the Settlement, including the Individual
8
Settlement Payments to be made to Settlement Class Members who filed claims and the
9
release specified in the Settlement. The Court finds that the Settlement is, in all respects,
10
fair, reasonable, and adequate to the Settling Parties, including the Representative
11
Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class. The Court also finds that the Settlement Class is
12
properly certified as a class for purposes of this Settlement and that relief with respect to
13
the Settlement Class as a whole is appropriate.
14
6.
In making the determination that the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and
15
adequate, the Court has considered (a) the strengths and weaknesses in Plaintiffs’ case,
16
including the presence of substantial issues in dispute; (b) the risks, expense, complexity,
17
and likely duration of further litigation; (c) the risks to Plaintiffs of establishing and
18
maintaining class-action status; (d) the monetary amount of the Settlement, including the
19
amounts of the Individual Settlement Payments; (e) the extent of both formal and
20
informal discovery that has been conducted by the parties; and (f) the views of the
21
Settling Parties’ respective counsel, both of whom are experienced in complex class-
22
action litigation of this nature. Furthermore, this Court notes that not a single objection
23
was filed to the Settlement and that only six individuals elected to exclude themselves.
24
These additional factors lead the Court to conclude that the Settlement is fair, reasonable,
25
adequate, and supported by the Class.
26
7.
As of the date of final approval of the Settlement, each and every Released
27
Claim (as defined in the Settlement Agreement) of every Settlement Class Member who
28
did not timely exclude himself or herself from the Settlement is conclusively released as
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
1
to the Released Parties. Accordingly, only those six individuals identified by the Claims
2
Administrator as having requested exclusion from the Settlement shall be deemed to have
3
properly requested exclusion. The six excluded individuals are specifically identified on
4
the opt-out forms attached hereto as Exhibit A. Other than these individuals, all
5
Settlement Class Members are permanently enjoined and restrained from commencing or
6
prosecuting any released claims in any jurisdiction or court against the Released Parties.
7
8.
The Settlement does not constitute an admission or concession by
8
Defendant, nor does this Order or the Judgment that accompanies it constitute a finding
9
of any kind as to the validity of any claims asserted in the operative Complaints or of any
10
wrongdoing on the part of Defendant. Furthermore, the Settlement shall not be used in
11
any way or for any purpose as an admission of any fault, omission, or wrongdoing on the
12
part of Defendant. Accordingly, neither the Settlement nor any of the negotiations or
13
proceedings related thereto shall be considered as, or deemed to be evidence of, a
14
concession or admission with regard to the denials or defenses of Defendant. Likewise,
15
neither the Settlement nor any of the negotiations or proceedings related thereto shall be
16
offered in evidence in any action or proceeding against Defendant in any court,
17
administrative agency, or other tribunal for any purpose whatsoever other than to enforce
18
the provisions of this Order, the Judgment, or the Settlement.
19
9.
Alan Harris and David Zelenski of the firm of Harris & Ruble, along with
20
David Harris of North Bay Law Group, having been appointed as Class Counsel by the
21
Preliminary Approval Order, are hereby confirmed as Class Counsel. Class Counsel have
22
adequately represented the Settlement Class herein. Similarly, Tamarah Seielstad,
23
Kennyon Morris, and Karen Jiron, all of whom had been appointed as Representative
24
Plaintiffs by the Preliminary Approval Order, are confirmed as Representative Plaintiffs,
25
having adequately represented the Settlement Class herein.
26
10.
In accordance with the Settlement, Class Counsel have requested that the
27
Representative Plaintiffs receive Enhancement Payments as follows: $15,000 to Plaintiff
28
Seielstad, $5,000 to Plaintiff Morris, and $5,000 to Plaintiff Jiron. The Court hereby
4
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
1
awards them the requested amounts based on its finding that the amounts awarded are
2
reasonable under the circumstances.
3
11.
Pursuant to the Settlement, Class Counsel have requested an award of
4
attorney’s fees and costs in the amount of $312,648.55, consisting of fees in the amount
5
of $300,000.00 and costs in the amount of $12,648.55. The requested awards of fees and
6
costs are granted, based on the Court’s findings that the amounts requested are fair and
7
reasonable under the circumstances, are supported by sufficient records, and are
8
supported by the lodestar crosscheck. The Court also awards the Claims Administrator
9
its costs and fees in the requested amount of $36,435.61.
10
12.
In accordance with the accompanying Judgment, the Court hereby dismisses
11
this action against Defendant on the merits and with prejudice and without costs other
12
than as provided in the Settlement.
13
13.
Without affecting the finality of this Order or the Judgment in any way, the
14
Court hereby retains continuing jurisdiction over (a) the implementation of the
15
Settlement, (b) the payment of the amount of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to be
16
awarded to Class Counsel as provided in the Settlement, and (c) all Parties hereto for the
17
purpose of enforcing and administering the Settlement.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
21
DATED: January 17, 2012
U.S. District Court Judge
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
y,//d
Gilardi ClaimID
SLSTAD120018576
SLSTAD120019734
SLSTAD130001013
SLSTAD130019877
SLSTAD120018703
SLSTAD120000138
FirstName
CYNTHIA
DEBORAH
FABIOLA
SHANNON
CECILIA
CHRISTINE
LastName
CAMPBELL
CHESTER
HEINDEL
MASSEY
OJEDA DE POLO
SCHOONVELD
City
PASO ROBLES
INDIO
PLEASANT HILL
PACIFICA
IRVINE
SACRAMENTO
Exclusions Received as of September 16, 2011
Case Name - Seielstad v. Aegis Senior Communities LLC
Case Administration Statistics - CONFIDENTIAL
State
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
OptOut
8/24/2011
8/29/2011
7/18/2011
6/10/2011
6/10/2011
6/29/2011
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?