Seielstad v. Aegis Senior Communities LLC et al

Filing 99

FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 17, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Alan Harris (SBN 146079) David Zelenski (SBN 231768) HARRIS & RUBLE 6424 Santa Monica Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90038 Telephone: 323.962.3777 Facsimile: 323.962.3004 David S. Harris (SBN 215224) NORTH BAY LAW GROUP 116 East Blithedale Avenue, Suite 2 Mill Valley, California 94941 Telephone: 415.388.8788 Facsimile: 415.388.8770 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 TAMARAH R. SEIELSTAD, individually Case No. 09-01797 MMC and on behalf of all others similarly situated, [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff, Assigned to Hon. Maxine M. Chesney v. AEGIS SENIOR COMMUNITIES, LLC, Defendant. 19 20 KENNYON MORRIS, et al., 21 22 23 24 25 Plaintiffs, Case No. 10-2060 MMC Assigned to Hon. Maxine M. Chesney v. AEGIS SENIOR COMMUNITIES, LLC, Defendant. Date: September 30, 2011 Time: 9:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 7, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] FINAL J. OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 3 In accordance with the Order Granting Final Approval of Class-Action Settlement (“Final Approval Order”) entered by the Court in this action, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The two Settlement Classes conditionally certified in the Preliminary 4 Approval Order are confirmed. Specifically, Settlement Class A consists of all current 5 and former non-exempt, hourly paid California employees of Defendant performing care- 6 manager duties in the position of lead care manager, care manager, medical care 7 manager, and medical technician from April 24, 2005, to and including April 15, 2011; 8 Settlement Class B consists of all former California employees of Defendant who were 9 terminated from Defendant’s employment between the time period April 24, 2005, to and 10 11 including April 15, 2011. 2. Judgment is hereby entered dismissing the above-captioned actions against 12 Defendant on the merits and with prejudice and without the payment of fees or costs 13 other than as provided in the Settlement referred to in the Final Approval Order. 14 3. Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, the Court hereby 15 retains continuing jurisdiction over (a) the implementation of the Settlement as described 16 in the Final Approval Order, (b) the payment of the amount of reasonable attorney’s fees 17 and costs to be awarded to Class Counsel as provided for in the Settlement, and (c) all 18 Parties hereto for the purpose of administering the Settlement and enforcing the terms of 19 this Judgment. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 DATED: January 17, 2012 U.S. District Court Judge 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] FINAL J. OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?