Seielstad v. Aegis Senior Communities LLC et al

Filing 99

FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 17, 2012. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Alan Harris (SBN 146079)
David Zelenski (SBN 231768)
HARRIS & RUBLE
6424 Santa Monica Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90038
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 323.962.3004
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
David S. Harris (SBN 215224)
NORTH BAY LAW GROUP
116 East Blithedale Avenue, Suite 2
Mill Valley, California 94941
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.388.8770
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17
18

TAMARAH R. SEIELSTAD, individually Case No. 09-01797 MMC
and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Plaintiff,
Assigned to Hon. Maxine M. Chesney
v.
AEGIS SENIOR COMMUNITIES, LLC,
Defendant.

19
20

KENNYON MORRIS, et al.,

21
22
23
24
25

Plaintiffs,

Case No. 10-2060 MMC
Assigned to Hon. Maxine M. Chesney

v.
AEGIS SENIOR COMMUNITIES, LLC,
Defendant.

Date: September 30, 2011
Time: 9:00 a.m.
Place: Courtroom 7, 450 Golden Gate
Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102

26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] FINAL J. OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1
2
3

In accordance with the Order Granting Final Approval of Class-Action Settlement
(“Final Approval Order”) entered by the Court in this action, IT IS ORDERED that:
1.

The two Settlement Classes conditionally certified in the Preliminary

4

Approval Order are confirmed. Specifically, Settlement Class A consists of all current

5

and former non-exempt, hourly paid California employees of Defendant performing care-

6

manager duties in the position of lead care manager, care manager, medical care

7

manager, and medical technician from April 24, 2005, to and including April 15, 2011;

8

Settlement Class B consists of all former California employees of Defendant who were

9

terminated from Defendant’s employment between the time period April 24, 2005, to and

10
11

including April 15, 2011.
2.

Judgment is hereby entered dismissing the above-captioned actions against

12

Defendant on the merits and with prejudice and without the payment of fees or costs

13

other than as provided in the Settlement referred to in the Final Approval Order.

14

3.

Without affecting the finality of this Judgment in any way, the Court hereby

15

retains continuing jurisdiction over (a) the implementation of the Settlement as described

16

in the Final Approval Order, (b) the payment of the amount of reasonable attorney’s fees

17

and costs to be awarded to Class Counsel as provided for in the Settlement, and (c) all

18

Parties hereto for the purpose of administering the Settlement and enforcing the terms of

19

this Judgment.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23

DATED: January 17, 2012
U.S. District Court Judge

24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] FINAL J. OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE