Global IP Solutions, Inc. v. Netease.Com, Inc. et al

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE SCHEDULING. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 11/18/09. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2009)

Case3:09-cv-01883-JCS Document34

Filed11/17/09 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

FLASHPOINT LAW, INC. SHIRISH GUPTA (SBN 205584) 3 Waters Park Drive, Suite 224 San Mateo, CA 94403 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff Global IP Solutions, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION GLOBAL IP SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. NETEASE.COM, INC. and NETEASE, BEIJING, Defendants. Case No. CV-09-1883 JCS JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SCHEDULING

SF-2767803

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER; CASE NO: CV 09-1883 JCS

Case3:09-cv-01883-JCS Document34

Filed11/17/09 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 · · ·

At the end of the November 13, 2009 Case Management Conference, the Court scheduled a further Case Management Conference for December 4, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. In light of the compressed schedule, the parties, Plaintiff Global IP Solutions, Inc. and Defendants NetEase.Com, Inc. and NetEase Beijing, by and through their undersigned attorneys, stipulate to the following schedule for pre-conference due dates: November 20, 2009 will be the last day to: meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection and discovery plan; file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel; and file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. The parties further stipulate that November 27, 2009 will be the last day to file the Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement. Dated: November 17, 2009 FLASHPOINT LAW, INC. By: /s/ Shirish Gupta Shirish Gupta Attorneys for Plaintiff Global IP Solutions, Inc. Dated: November 17, 2009 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Patrick J. Zhang Patrick J. Zhang Attorneys for Defendants Netease.com, Inc. and Netease Beijing
UNIT ED
S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

24 25 26 27 28

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
NO

S

S T RIC

1
SF-2767803 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER; CASE NO: CV 09-1883 JCS

A

LI

FO

Nov. 18 Dated: ________________, 2009

s Judge Jo _____________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO ER N United States Magistrate F C Judge DI TO

pero eph C. S

R NIA

RT

H