Global IP Solutions, Inc. v. Netease.Com, Inc. et al

Filing 53

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/12/10. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2010)

Case3:09-cv-01883-JCS Document52

Filed04/12/10 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

FLASHPOINT LAW, INC. SHIRISH GUPTA (SBN 205584) 3 Waters Park Drive, Suite 224 San Mateo, CA 94403 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff Global IP Solutions, Inc. MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) [e-mail] PATRICK J. ZHANG (CA SBN 251392) [e-mail] MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendants NETEASE.COM, INC. and NETEASE BEIJING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION GLOBAL IP SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. NETEASE.COM, INC. and NETEASE, BEIJING, Defendants. Case No. CV-09-1883 JCS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Mag. Judge Spero

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; CASE NO: CV 09-1883 JCS

Case3:09-cv-01883-JCS Document52

Filed04/12/10 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21

Pursuant to a settlement agreement between the parties and Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Global IP Solutions, Inc and Defendants Netease.com, Inc. and Netease Beijing, through their Attorneys of Record, hereby stipulate that the abovecaptioned action is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own costs and fees. Dated: April 12, 2010 FLASHPOINT LAW, INC. By: /s/ Shirish Gupta Shirish Gupta Attorneys for Plaintiff Global IP Solutions, Inc. Dated: April 12, 2010 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP By: /s/ Patrick J. Zhang____ Patrick J. Zhang Attorneys for Defendants Netease.com, Inc. and Netease Beijing E-Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X.B. regarding nonfiling signatories, Shirish Gupta hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Patrick Zhang. [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the above Stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. This matter is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety and each party shall bear its own costs and fees.
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

April 12, 2010 Dated: ________________

24 25 26 27 28

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; CASE NO: CV 09-1883 JCS

A

C

LI

FO

Judge Jo

seph C.

Spero

R NIA

23

By: __________________________ Hon. Joseph C. Spero United States Magistrate Judge
NO

UNIT ED

22

RT

H