Williams v. Curry

Filing 7

USCA ORDER : Denying the application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. ss2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court is denied. (ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2010)

Download PDF
Case: 09-73278 01/21/2010 Page: 1 of 2 DktEntry: 7202046 F IL E D U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAN 21 2010 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S G R E G O R Y WAYNE WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. N o . 09-73278 ORDER B E N CURRY, Warden Respondent. B efo re: SILVERMAN, PAEZ and BEA, Circuit Judges. The application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court is denied. Petitioner has not m ad e a prima facie showing under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2) that: (A ) the claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously u n av ailab le; or ( B ) (i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered p rev io u sly through the exercise of due diligence; and (ii) the facts u n d erlyin g the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a w h o le , would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence th at, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found th e petitioner guilty of the underlying offense. KKC/MOATT Case: 09-73278 01/21/2010 Page: 2 of 2 DktEntry: 7202046 N o petition for rehearing or motion for reconsideration shall be filed or en tertain ed in this case. See 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3)(E). KKC/MOATT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?