City and County of San Francisco et al v. United States Postal Service et al

Filing 210

ORDER GRANTING Stipulation 209 re Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 6/30/2011. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2011)

1
2
3
4

STEPHEN L. COLLIER (State Bar No. 124877)
E-mail: [e-mail]
TENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC
126 Hyde Street, 2nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Attorney for Plaintiffs
CENTRAL CITY SRO COLLABORATIVE, SAN FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION, and
HOUSING RIGHTS COMMITTEE OF SAN FRANCISCO
MICHAEL M. MARKMAN (State Bar No. 191388)
E-mail: [e-mail]
KELLY P. FINLEY (State Bar No. 247519)
E-mail: [e-mail]
JOSHUA D. HURWIT (State Bar No. 263108)
E-mail: [e-mail]
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.591.6091
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CENTRAL CITY SRO COLLABORATIVE,
SAN FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION, and HOUSING RIGHTS COMMITTEE OF SAN
FRANCISCO
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney
JOANN M. SWANSON
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
JONATHAN U. LEE (CSBN 148792)
THOMAS R. GREEN (CSBN 203480)
VICTORIA R. CARRADERO (CSBN 217885)
Assistant United States Attorneys
Northern District of California
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055
San Francisco, California 94102
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant U. S. Postal Service
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 3:09-cv-01964-RS (EDL)

1
2

Civil Case No.: 3:09-cv-01964-RS (EDL)

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,

3
4

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO
COMPEL RESPONSES TO SAN
FRANCISCO TENANT UNION’S
INTERROGATORIES

Plaintiffs,
v.

5
6

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
et al.,
Defendants.

7

WHEREAS, on June 29, 2011, Defendant United States Postal Service’s (“Postal

8
9

Service”) filed a revised version of its brief in opposition to Plaintiff City and County of San

10

Francisco (the “City”) Motion to Compel Complete Responses to Plaintiff San Francisco Tenant

11

Union’s Interrogatories (the “Motion”) pursuant to the Court’s instructions at the June 27, 2011

12

hearing; the United States Postal Service represents that no argument or evidence was added;
WHEREAS, Plaintiff City and County of San Francisco’s (the “City”) reply brief

13
14

in support of the Motion is due on June 30, 2011;

15

WHEREAS, the hearing is set for July 26, 2011;

16

WHEREAS, although the United States Postal Service contends that no argument

17

or evidence was added, the parties agree that Plaintiffs may have additional time to review and

18

consider the Postal Service’s revised brief before filing its reply brief; and
WHEREAS, the parties prefer to maintain the July 26, 2011 hearing date if such

19
20

date is convenient for the Court;
THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE AS FOLLOWS:

21
1.

23

a.m., or on such date and time as the Court may otherwise direct.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.

26
27

The Motion shall be heard, as previously scheduled, on July 26, 2011 at 9:00

2011.

24
25

The City shall file its reply brief in support of the Motion no later than July 7,

2.

22

Dated:

June 30, 2011

By:

28

/s/
Stephen L. Collier
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:09-cv-01964-RS (EDL)

1

1

CENTRAL CITY SRO
COLLABORATIVE, SAN
FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION,
and HOUSING RIGHTS
COMMITTEE OF SAN FRANCISCO

2
3
4

Michael M. Markman
Kelly P. Finley
Joshua D. Hurwit

5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, CENTRAL CITY SRO
COLLABORATIVE, SAN
FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION,
and HOUSING RIGHTS
COMMITTEE OF SAN FRANCISCO

7
8
9
10
11

Dated:

June 30, 2011

By:

/s/

12
Jonathan U. Lee
Thomas R. Green
Victoria Carradero

13
14

Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES POSTAL
SERVICE

15
16
17

20

UNIT
ED

June 30, 2011
________________

____________________________________
D
RDERE
Hon.IElizabeth D. Laporte
S SO O
IT

21

NO

RT

ER

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case No. 3:09-cv-01964-RS (EDL)

2

A

H

23

LI

22

porte

h D. La

lizabet
Judge E

R NIA

Dated:

FO

19

S

IT IS SO ORDERED:

RT
U
O

18

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C