City and County of San Francisco et al v. United States Postal Service et al

Filing 231

STIPULATION AND ORDER re In Camera review of documents on privilege log; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 7/21/2011. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
DANNY CHOU, State Bar #180240
Chief of Complex and Special Litigation
SHERRI SOKELAND KAISER, State Bar #197986
TARA M. STEELEY, State Bar #231775
Deputy City Attorneys
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, California 94102-4682
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
MICHAEL M. MARKMAN, State Bar #191388
KELLY P. FINLEY, State Bar #247519
JOSHUA D. HURWIT, State Bar #263108
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CENTRAL CITY SRO COLLABORATIVE,
SAN FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION, and
HOUSING RIGHTS COMMITTEE OF SAN FRANCISCO

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, CENTRAL CITY SRO
COLLABORATIVE, SAN FRANCISCO
TENANTS UNION, and HOUSING RIGHTS
COMMITTEE OF SAN FRANCISCO

Case No. C09-1964 RS (EDL)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
IN CAMERA REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS ON
PRIVILEGE LOG

Plaintiffs,
vs.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE;
JOHN E. POTTER, MICHAEL DALEY and
NOEMI LUNA, in their official capacities,
Defendants.

27
28
STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. C09-1964 RS

n:\govlit\li2009\090828\00713367.doc

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

WHEREAS the Court issued an order on July 12, 2011 granting in part and denying in part
Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant to Produce Privilege Log (Docket 155);
WHEREAS the Court "agreed to examine a limited number of documents in camera to
evaluate the adequacy of the [Defendant's privilege] log";
WHEREAS the Court ordered the parties to "provide the documents to the Court no later than
July 26, 2011";
WHEREAS the parties have been meeting and conferring over which documents to submit to

8

the Court for in camera review and have agreed to a schedule for reaching an agreement on those

9

documents;

10
11

WHEREAS due to the vacation schedules of the City's counsel, the parties need an additional
week to submit documents to the Court for in camera review;

12

THEREFORE, the parties HEREBY STIPULATE THAT:

13

The parties shall provide the documents to the Court for in camera review no later than August

14

2, 2011.

15

Dated: July 18, 2011

16

By:/s/ Danny Chou
DANNY CHOU

17

Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney
Danny Chou
Sherri Sokeland Kaiser
Tara M. Steeley

18
19
20

Attorneys for Plaintiff
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

21

Michael M. Markman
Kelly P. Finley
Joshua D. Hurwit

22
23

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
CENTRAL CITY SRO COLLABORATIVE,
SAN FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION, and
HOUSING RIGHTS COMMITTEE OF SAN
FRANCISCO

24
25
26
27
28
STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. C09-1964 RS

1

n:\govlit\li2009\090828\00713367.doc

Dates: July 18, 2011

2

By:/s/Jonathan U. Lee
JONATHAN U. LEE

3

Melinda Haag, United States Attorney
Joann M. Swanson
Jonathan U. Lee
Thomas R. Green
Victoria Carradero

4
5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CENTRAL CITY SRO COLLABORATIVE, SAN
FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION, and HOUSING
RIGHTS COMMITTEE OF SAN FRANCISCO
COUNTY

7
8
9

*THE FILER OF THIS DOCUMENT ATTESTS THAT CONCURRENCE IN THE FILING OF
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM THE OTHER SIGNATORY.

11

21
Dated: July __, 2011

S

ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
________________________________
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
e
. Laport
abeth D
liz
Judge E

15

NO

16

RT

ER

H

17
18
19

R NIA

14

FO

13

RT
U
O

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

12

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

LI

10

A

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. C09-1964 RS

2

n:\govlit\li2009\090828\00713367.doc