City and County of San Francisco et al v. United States Postal Service et al

Filing 245

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 242 Joint filing concerning in camera review of documents on privilege log; Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 8/3/2011. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
DANNY CHOU, State Bar #180240
Chief of Complex and Special Litigation
SHERRI SOKELAND KAISER, State Bar #197986
TARA M. STEELEY, State Bar #231775
Deputy City Attorneys
City Hall, Room 234
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, California 94102-4682
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
MICHAEL M. MARKMAN, State Bar #191388
KELLY P. FINLEY, State Bar #247519
JOSHUA D. HURWIT, State Bar #263108
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CENTRAL CITY SRO COLLABORATIVE,
SAN FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION, and
HOUSING RIGHTS COMMITTEE OF SAN FRANCISCO

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, CENTRAL CITY SRO
COLLABORATIVE, SAN FRANCISCO
TENANTS UNION, and HOUSING RIGHTS
COMMITTEE OF SAN FRANCISCO

Case No. C09-1964 RS (EDL)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
JOINT FILING CONCERNING IN CAMERA
REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS ON PRIVILEGE
LOG

Plaintiffs,
vs.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE;
JOHN E. POTTER, MICHAEL DALEY and
NOEMI LUNA, in their official capacities,
Defendants.

27
28
STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. C09-1964 RS

n:\govlit\li2011\090828\00716702.doc

WHEREAS the Court issued an order on July 12, 2011 granting in part and denying in part

1
2

Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant to Produce Privilege Log (Docket 155);
WHEREAS the Court "agreed to examine a limited number of documents in camera to

3
4

evaluate the adequacy of the [Defendant's privilege] log";
WHEREAS the Court subsequently ordered the parties to "provide the documents to the Court

5
6

for in camera review no later than August 2, 2011";

7

After further meet and confer, the parties HEREBY STIPULATE THAT:

8

1.

9

The parties will submit a joint brief to the Court containing Defendant's objections and

the City's responses concerning the documents selected for in camera review by Wednesday, August 3,

10

2011. This joint submission will be succinct, describing in brief the parties’ position regarding the

11

documents selected by the City for in camera review.
2.

12

Defendant will lodge the documents selected by the City for in camera review no later

13

than Wednesday, August 3, 2011.

14

Dated: August 2, 2011

15

By:/s/ Tara Steeley
TARA STEELEY

16

Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney
Danny Chou
Sherri Sokeland Kaiser
Tara M. Steeley

17
18
19

Attorneys for Plaintiff
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

20

Michael M. Markman
Kelly P. Finley
Joshua D. Hurwit

21
22

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,
CENTRAL CITY SRO COLLABORATIVE,
SAN FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION, and
HOUSING RIGHTS COMMITTEE OF SAN
FRANCISCO

23
24
25
26
///
27
///
28
STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. C09-1964 RS

1

n:\govlit\li2011\090828\00716702.doc

1

Dates: August 2, 2011
By:*/s/Jonathan U. Lee
JONATHAN U. LEE

2
3

Melinda Haag, United States Attorney
Joann M. Swanson
Jonathan U. Lee
Thomas R. Green
Victoria Carradero

4
5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
CENTRAL CITY SRO COLLABORATIVE, SAN
FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION, and HOUSING
RIGHTS COMMITTEE OF SAN FRANCISCO
COUNTY

7
8
9
10

*THE FILER OF THIS DOCUMENT ATTESTS THAT CONCURRENCE IN THE FILING OF
THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED FROM THE OTHER SIGNATORY.

11
PROPOSED ORDER

13

15
3
Dated: August ____, 2011

RT

18

H

ER

LI

NO

17

________________________________
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge Laporte
D.
lizabeth
Judge E

19
20

A

16

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

R NIA

UNIT
ED

S

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT
U
O

14

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

FO

12

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP & [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. C09-1964 RS

2

n:\govlit\li2011\090828\00716702.doc