City and County of San Francisco et al v. United States Postal Service et al

Filing 31

ORDER Granting 30 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on November 12, 2009. (jswlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-01964-JSW Document30 Filed11/10/09 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (SBN 44332) United States Attorney JOANN M. SWANSON (CSBN 88143) Chief, Civil Division JONATHAN U. LEE (CSBN 148792) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 9th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-6909 Facsimile: (415) 436-6748 Attorneys for Federal Defendant UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CENTRAL CITY SRO COLLABORATIVE, SAN FRANCISCO TENANTS UNION, and HOUSING RIGHTS COMMITTEE OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; JOHN E. POTTER, MICHAEL DALEY and NOEMI LUNA, in their official capacities, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 09-1964 JSW STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER Subject to the approval of the Court, the parties stipulate that the initial case management conference be postponed from the pending date of November 13, 2009 to a new date of November 20, 2009, at 1:30 p.m. before this Court. The parties reach this stipulation in order to accommodate the attendance of AUSA Lee at a mandatory settlement conference in Cruz Hernandez v. USA, Action 06-3350 SBA. The Court assigned the settlement conference to Magistrate Laporte by order dated November 2, 2009. Magistrate Laporte's availability for conducting the settlement conference is limited to Case3:09-cv-01964-JSW Document30 Filed11/10/09 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 November 13, 2009, beginning at 11:00 p.m. This was the only date in the remainder of 2009 on which Magistrate Laporte could preside over the settlement conference. Magistrate Laporte issued an order on November 5, 2009 scheduling the settlement conference for November 13, 2009. As a result, there is a scheduling conflict between the newly-ordered settlement conference in Hernandez and the initial case management conference in this action. All counsel are available to proceed on November 20th, should the Court grant the proposed order attached to this stipulation. Counsel filed an updated joint statement on November 6, 2009 and request permission from the Court to go forward with the conference on November 20th without filing an additional joint statement. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney Dated: November 10, 2009 _____/s/_______________________ JONATHAN U. LEE Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Federal Defendants ___/s/___________________________ SHERRI SOKELAND KAISER TARA STEELEY Attorneys for Plaintiff City and County of San Francisco Dated: November 10, 2009 Dated: November 10, 2009 ___/s/___________________________ STEPHEN L. COLLIER Attorney for Plaintiffs Central City SRO Collaborative, San Francisco Tenants Union, and Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER C09-1964 JSW 2 Case3:09-cv-01964-JSW Document30 Filed11/10/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER C09-1964 JSW PROPOSED ORDER January 15, 2010 The Case Management Conference is rescheduled for Friday, November 20, 2009 at 1:30 p.m. The parties are not required to file an additional joint statement. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. November 12, 2009 DATED: _________________ _______________________________________ THE HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Court Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?