Ruddy et al v. Pfizer, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer in case 3:09-cv-01991-CRB; denying (3090) Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in case M:05-cv-01699-CRB (crblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE BEXTRA AND CELEBREX MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND 12 PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION,
13 14 15 16 17 18

No. MDL 05-01699 CRB ORDER

/ This document relates to: Joseph C. Ruddy, Jr., et al. v. Pfizer Inc. et al., Case No. 09-CV-1991-CRB ____________________________________/ The Court is in receipt of a motion from Plaintiff Joseph C. Ruddy Jr. requesting

19 additional time to comply with Pretrial Orders 6 and 31, as well as the opposition to Plaintiff's 20 motion, filed by Defendant Pfizer. Having carefully reviewed the parties' papers, the Court 21 finds that Plaintiff's failure to comply with PTOS 6 and 31 by either July 6, 2009, the date 22 agreed to with opposing counsel, or July 24, 2009, the motion hearing in his case, is not 23 excused. Plaintiff's motion is therefore DENIED. Plaintiff is free to seek additional time 24 from the Special Master in response to Defendant's expected compliance motion. 25

IT IS SO ORDERED. CHARLES R. BREYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26 Dated: August 3, 2009 27 28

G:\CRBALL\2005\1699\ordersmisc\orderreruddy.wpd