Carnero et al v. Luke Weaver et al

Filing 82

FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE DISREGARD.

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 No. C 11-03896 SI LORENZO ROBERTSON, 7 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Plaintiff, v. 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Defendants. / 11 12 On September 6, 2011, defendant Chex Systems, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s pro 13 se complaint. The motion is scheduled for a hearing on November 18, 2011. Pursuant to Civil Local 14 Rule 7-3(a), plaintiff’s opposition was due by September 20, 2011. Plaintiff has not yet filed an 15 opposition, nor has he communicated in any way with the Court concerning these matters. In addition, 16 defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. has filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, set for 17 hearing on December 2, 2011. Plaintiff’s opposition to that motion was due on November 3, 2011. 18 Here, too, plaintiff has neither filed an opposition nor contacted the Court in any way. 19 Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing to be filed no later than 20 November 18, 2011, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. 21 See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(b). Plaintiff is notified that an inadequate or untimely response will result in 22 dismissal. The November 18, 2011 and December 2, 2011 hearings are hereby VACATED, and will 23 be rescheduled if necessary. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: November 8, 2011 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?