Moreno et al v. Rancho Grande Supermarket et al

Filing 23

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 22 Stipulation filed by Reveriano Navarrete, Noe Godinez, Tania Moreno. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/21/10. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

ADAM WANG, Bar No. 201233 ADAM PEDERSEN, Bar No. 261901 LAW OFFICES OF ADAM WANG 12 South First Street, Suite 708 San Jose, CA 95113 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] [e-mail] Attorney for Plaintiffs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NAVARETTE, ET AL Plaintiffs, vs. RANCHO GRANDE, ET AL Defendants Case No.: 3:09-cv-02015-EMC STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE & [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

1.

Parties have reached a settlement with respect to all claims of all Plaintiffs

against all Defendants in this case. 2. prejudice. 3. The Parties stipulate that this Court should retain its jurisdiction over this case for As such, parties hereby stipulate to dismiss this action in its entirety with

the purpose of enforcing the settlement agreement.

1 STIPULATION TO DISMISS Navarette, et al. v. Rancho Grande, et al.

3:09-cv-02015-EMC

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ______________________________________________________

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

Dated: May 20, 2010

By:

/s/ Adam Pedersen ADAM PEDERSEN Attorney for Plaintiffs

Dated: May 20, 2010 By: ___/s/Kerry Kennedy____ KERRY KENNEDY Attorney for Defendants

[PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to party's stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. 5/21 Dated: ____________, 2010

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

D IS T IC T R

OF

2 STIPULATION TO DISMISS Navarette, et al. v. Rancho Grande, et al.

3:09-cv-02015-EMC

A

C

LI

FO

dward Judge E

M. Che

n

R NIA

_________________________ RED Hon. EdwardORDE SO Chen IT IS United States District Court

RT U O

NO

RT

H