DeFrancesco v. GS Associates Joint Venture et al

Filing 32

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/6/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 12/30/2010. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/22/10. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2010) Modified on 9/23/2010 (cl, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
E-Filed 9/23/10* 1 PAUL L. REIN, Esq. (SBN 43053) 2 CATHERINE M. CABALO, Esq. (SBN 248198) 3 200 Lakeside Drive, Suite A 4 Telephone: 510/832-5001 5 reinlawoffice@aol.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 9 10 11 SEBASTIAN DEFRANCESCO, 12 13 v. 14 CELIA McGUINNESS, Esq. (SBN 159420) LAW OFFICES OF PAUL L. REIN Oakland, CA 94612 Facsimile: 510/832-4787 SEBASTIAN DEFRANCESCO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. C09-2044 RS Civil Rights Plaintiff, COCOA DEVELOPMENT 15 RETAIL, LLC dba GHIRARDELLI SQUARE 16 GARAGE; JMA VENTURES LLC; COCOA PRC II, LLC; and 17 DOES 1-10, Inclusive, 18 19 20 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56, PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 Defendants. / Plaintiff's motion for administrative relief from General Order 56 is hereby 21 GRANTED for good cause shown. A case management conference is set for 22 Ja__ar_______at____, with case management conference statements due _ nu _ y 6, 2011 _ 10:00 Dec ____ 30, ____ 23 ___ember___2010 __. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 9/22 27 Dated: __________, 2010 28 L A W O F F IC E S O F Honorable RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge -1- PAUL L. REIN 200 L A K E S I D E D R ., S U I T E A O A K L A N D , C A 94612-3503 (510) 832-5001 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF FROM GENERAL ORDER 56 CASE NO. C09-2044 RS S:\CASES\G\GHIRARDELLI\PLEADINGS\Proposed Order for Relief from GO 56.PL.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?