San Francisco Residence Club, Inc et al v. Amado et al

Filing 77

ORDER RE: 76 MOTION FOR DENIAL OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE CONTINUANCE OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 05/04/2010. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/4/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION SAN FRANCISCO RESIDENCE CLUB, INC., et al. Plaintiffs, No. C 09-2054 RS ORDER RE: MOTION FOR DENIAL OR CONTINUANCE OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT *E-Filed 05/04/2010* United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. HENRY A. AMADO, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/ On May 04, 2010, defendants filed a document entitled "Defendants' FRCP 56(f) Motion For Denial or Continuance of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment." Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is scheduled for hearing on May 27, 2010. Defendants' opposition papers are due on May 06, 2010; they contend that a meaningful response to two claims plaintiffs advance in their motion depends on receipt of certain outstanding discovery. Defendants shall file any substantive opposition on the merits that they may have, based on the information they presently possess by the May 06 deadline. Defendants shall include further explanation in the opposition papers as to why and how the specific outstanding discovery would create a genuine issue of material fact. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dated: 05/04/2010 RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?