Temple v. Guardsmark, LLC

Filing 144

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice, with each side to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs re 143 (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2011) Modified on 3/22/2011 (ys, COURT STAFF).

Temple v. Guardsmark, LLC

Doc. 144

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

MARTIN D. BERN (153203) [e-mail] MALCOLM A. HEINICKE (SBN 194174) [e-mail] MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant GUARDSMARK, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHILLIP TEMPLE and JOHNNY MCFARLAND, on behalf of themselves individually, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. CV-09-2124-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Judge: The Honorable Susan Illston

14 vs. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
13408225.1

GUARDSMARK, LLC, and DOES 1 through 100, INCLUSIVE, Defendant(s).

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE CV-09-2124 SI

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
13408225.1

WHEREAS, the parties have reached an agreement that calls for the dismissal with prejudice of this action, with each side to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs; WHEREAS, the parties agree that the dismissal with prejudice of this action would preclude Plaintiffs from bringing any future claims related to their employment with Defendant, including without limitation any claims under the California Labor Code or the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act; and WHEREAS, the parties wish to secure court approval of this dismissal and its associated effect: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT this action is dismissed in its entirety and with prejudice to the claims of Plaintiffs Temple and McFarland. Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP MARTIN D. BERN MALCOLM A. HEINICKE

DATED: March 16, 2011

By:

/s/ Malcolm A. Heinicke MALCOLM A. HEINICKE

Attorneys for Defendant GUARDSMARK, LLC. Qualls & Workman DANIEL QUALLS

DATED: March 16, 2011

By:

/s/ Daniel Qualls DANIEL QUALLS

Attorney for Plaintiffs PHILLIP TEMPLE and JOHNNY McFARLAND Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. This action is hereby dismissed its entirety, and such dismissal shall be with prejudice to the individual claims of Plaintiffs Temple and McFarland. 3/18/11 ____________________________ The Honorable Susan Illston UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE CASE CV-09-2124 SI

-1-