Temple v. Guardsmark, LLC

Filing 54

PROTECTIVE ORDER (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/29/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

MARTIN D. BERN (153203) [e-mail] MALCOLM A. HEINICKE (SBN 194174) [e-mail] YUVAL MILLER (SBN 243492) [e-mail] MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant GUARDSMARK, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHILLIP TEMPLE, on behalf of himself, individually and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. GUARDSMARK, LLC, and DOES 1 through 100, INCLUSIVE, Defendant.

CASE NO. CV-09-2124-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING DISCOVERY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER; CASE NO. 07-03953 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

1.

PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Disclosure and discovery activity in this action will likely involve production of

confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation would be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge, as set forth in Section 10, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order creates no entitlement to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and reflects the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 2. DEFINITIONS 2.1 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors,

employees, consultants, retained experts, and outside counsel (and their support staff). 2.2 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of

the medium or manner generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, or tangible things) that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 2.3 Confidential Information or Items: information (regardless of how

generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under standards developed under F.R.Civ.P. 26(c). 2.4 Highly Confidential ­ Attorneys' Eyes Only Information or Items:

extremely sensitive Confidential Information or Items whose disclosure to another Party or nonparty would create a substantial risk of serious injury that could not be avoided by means less restrictive than those set forth herein. 2.5 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material

from a Producing Party. 2.6 Producing Party: a Party or non-party that produces Disclosure or

Discovery Material in this action.

-1-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER; CASE NO. 07-03953 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2.7

Designating Party: a Party or non-party that designates information or

items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as "Confidential" or "Highly Confidential -- Attorneys' Eyes Only." 2.8 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is within one

of the following categories: (a) client billing documents; (b) documents containing client security plans or instructions; (c) Mission Partnership Statements; (d) Operations Outlines for client accounts; (e) materials contained in personnel files and employee wage information; (f) Guardsmark's General Orders Regulations And Instructions For Uniformed Personnel (GOR&I) documents; (g) security guard long application forms; and (h) documents Guardsmark produces in this case that were produced by Plaintiff subject to a protective order in another case (e.g., Joseph Lanzarone v. Guardsmark, LLC, et al., Case No. CV06-1136R (Plax) (United States District Court, Central District of California)), and (i) all management manuals. 2.9 Outside Counsel: attorneys who are not employees of a Party but who are

retained to represent or advise a Party in this action (as well as their internal support staffs). 2.10 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a Party (as well as their

internal support staffs). 2.11 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel and House Counsel (as well

as their support staffs). 2.12 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter

pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. This definition includes a professional jury or trial consultant retained in connection with this litigation. 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support

services (e.g., photocopying; videotaping; translating; preparing exhibits or demonstrations; organizing, storing, retrieving data in any form or medium; etc.) and their employees and subcontractors.

-2-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER; CASE NO. 07-03953 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

3.

SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected

Material (as defined above), but also any information copied or extracted therefrom, as well as all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations thereof, plus testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or counsel to or in court or in other settings that might reveal Protected Material. 4. DURATION Even after the termination of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.

If it comes to a Party's or a non-party's attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all, or do not qualify for the level of protection initially asserted, that Party or non-party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this

Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a), below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires: (a) for information in documentary form (apart from transcripts of

depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" at the top, bottom or right margin of each page that contains protected material or, alternatively, on the first page of a multi-page document, if the entire document is protected. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party should endeavor to identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and specify, for -3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER; CASE NO. 07-03953 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

each portion, the level of protection being asserted (either "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY"). A Party or non-party that makes original documents or materials available for inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order, then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the appropriate legend ("CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY") at the top, bottom or right margin of each page that contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also should endeavor to identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins) and specify, for each portion, the level of protection being asserted (either "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY"). (b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial

proceedings, that the Party or non-party offering or sponsoring, or giving the testimony identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, and further specify any portions of the testimony that qualify as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." When it is impractical to identify separately each portion of testimony that is entitled to protection, and when it appears that substantial portions of the testimony may qualify for protection, the Party or non-party that sponsors, offers, or gives the testimony may invoke on the record (before the deposition or proceeding is concluded) a right to, during the time allocated for the witness to review and execute the deposition transcript, identify the specific portions of the testimony as to which protection is sought and to specify the level of protection being asserted ("CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY") during this review period. -4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER; CASE NO. 07-03953 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Transcript pages containing Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter, who must affix to the top of each such page the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY," as instructed by the Party or nonparty offering or sponsoring the witness or presenting the testimony. (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary,

and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the legend "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY." If only portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, should identify the protected portions, specifying whether they qualify as "Confidential" or as "Highly Confidential ­ Attorneys' Eyes Only." 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent

failure to designate qualified information or items as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party's right to secure protection under this Order for such material. If material is appropriately designated as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" after the material was initially produced, the Receiving Party, on timely notification of the designation, must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party's

confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a later significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. 6.2 Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a

Designating Party's confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice to voice dialogue; other forms of communication are not -5STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER; CASE NO. 07-03953 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

sufficient) with counsel for the Designating Party. In conferring, the challenging Party must explain the basis for its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A challenging Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has first engaged in this meet and confer process. 6.3 Judicial Intervention. A Party that elects to press a challenge to a

confidentiality designation after considering the justification offered by the Designating Party may file and serve a motion under Civil Local Rule 7 (and in compliance with Civil Local Rule 79-5, if applicable) that identifies the challenged material and sets forth in detail the basis for the challenge. Each such motion must be accompanied by a competent declaration that affirms that the movant has complied with the meet and confer requirements imposed in the preceding paragraph and that sets forth with specificity the justification for the confidentiality designation that was given by the Designating Party in the meet and confer dialogue. Until the court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party's designation. 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is

disclosed or produced by another Party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 11, below (FINAL DISPOSITION). Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order.

-6-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER; CASE NO. 07-03953 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 information.

7.2

Disclosure of "CONFIDENTIAL" Information or Items. Unless otherwise

ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated CONFIDENTIAL only to: (a) the Receiving Party's Outside Counsel of record in this action, as

well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation; (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of

the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation; (c) experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the "Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order" (Exhibit A); (d) (e) the Court and its personnel; court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation; (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure

is reasonably necessary. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; or (g) the author of the document or the original source of the

7.3

Disclosure of "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES

ONLY" Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY" only to: (a) the Receiving Party's Outside Counsel of record in this action, as

well as employees of said Counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation;

-7-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER; CASE NO. 07-03953 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 information. 8.

(b)

Experts (as defined in this Order) (1) to whom disclosure is

reasonably necessary for this litigation, and (2) who have signed the "Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order" (Exhibit A); (c) (d) the Court and its personnel; court reporters, their staffs, and professional vendors to whom

disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation; or (e) the author of the document or the original source of the

PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN

OTHER LITIGATION If a Receiving Party is served with a subpoena or an order issued in other litigation that would compel disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as "CONFIDENTIAL" or "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ­ ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY," the Receiving Party must so notify the Designating Party, in writing (by fax, if possible) immediately and in no event more than three court days after receiving the subpoena or order. Such notification must include a copy of the subpoena or court order. The Receiving Party also must immediately inform in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all the material covered by the subpoena or order is the subject of this Protective Order. In addition, the Receiving Party must deliver a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order promptly to the party in the other action that caused the subpoena or order to issue. The purpose of imposing these duties is to alert the interested parties to the existence of this Protective Order and to afford the Designating Party in this case an opportunity to try to protect its confidentiality interests in the court from which the subpoena or order issued. The Designating Party shall bear the burdens and the expenses of seeking protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

-8-

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER; CASE NO. 07-03953 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

9.

UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed

Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve all copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the "Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound" that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 10. FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL. Without written permission from the

Designating Party or a court order secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5, and may submit such request to the Court by letter brief. If necessitated by briefing, or other deadlines, a request to file under seal pursuant to Rule 79-5 may be made at the time of filing of a brief or other material. In such event, the Protected Material shall be provisionally lodged with the Court pending a determination of the request to file under seal. In the event that the Court denies a request by a Party to file under seal any document designated by the other Party as Confidential or Highly Confidential on the grounds that such document is not in fact confidential, the Party may thereafter file such document publicly, provided that the designating Party has had the opportunity to submit a letter brief to the Court addressing the confidentiality of the document(s) in question. The requirement of a party to file Protected Material shall not apply to the lodging of Protected Material with the Court in conjunction with letter briefs regarding discovery disputes. In such an event, the parties shall inform the Court that such Protected Materials are being lodged with the Court for in camera review only. // // // -9STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER; CASE NO. 07-03953 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

11.

FINAL DISPOSITION. Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the

Producing Party, within sixty days after the final termination of this action, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party. As used in this subdivision, "all Protected Material" includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other form of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. With permission in writing from the Designating Party, the Receiving Party may destroy some or all of the Protected Material instead of returning it. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the sixty day deadline that identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and that affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence or attorney work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION), above. 12. MISCELLANEOUS 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any

person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. // // // // // // // // // - 10 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER; CASE NO. 07-03953 SI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

12.2

Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this

Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use of any of the material covered by this Protective Order at trial, in evidence or otherwise. DATED: April 23, 2010 MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP

By:

/s/Martin D. Bern MARTIN D. BERN

Attorneys for Defendant GUARDSMARK, LLC DATED: April 23, 2010 QUALLS & WORKMAN, L.L.P.

By:

/s/Daniel H. Qualls DANIEL H. QUALLS

Attorneys for Plaintiff PHILLIP TEMPLE Filer's Attestation: I, Martin D. Bern , am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file this STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING DISCOVERY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. In compliance with General Order 45.X.B., I hereby attest that Daniel H. Qualls concurs in this filing. By: /s/ Martin D. Bern Martin D. Bern

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: ______________, 2010 HONORABLE SUSAN ILLSTON

- 11 -

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER; CASE NO. 07-03953 SI

1 2 3

EXHIBIT A ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of _________________ [print or

4 type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand 5 the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the 6 Northern District of California on [date] in the case of PHILLIP TEMPLE, et al. v. 7 GUARDSMARK, LLC, et al. CV-09-2124-SI). I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the 8 terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so 9 comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly 10 promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this 11 Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions 12 of this Order. 13 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for 14 the Northern District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated 15 Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. 16 I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full name] of 17 _______________________________________ [print or type full address and telephone 18 number] as my California agent for service of process in connection with this action or any 19 proceedings related to enforcement of this Stipulated Protective Order. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 12 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER; CASE NO. 07-03953 SI

Date: City and State where signed: Printed name: [printed name] Signature: [signature]