Walter et al v. Hughes Communications, Inc. et al
Filing
97
STIPULATION AND ORDER Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Amended Settlement Agreement Hearing set for 2/10/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Case Management Conference set for 11/29/11 is continued to 2/10/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 11/28/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Robert B. Hawk (SBN 118054)
J. Christopher Mitchell (SBN 215639)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
525 University Avenue, 4th Floor
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: (650) 463-4000
Facsimile: (650) 463-4199
robert.hawk@hoganlovells.com
chris.mitchell@hoganlovells.com
Attorneys for Defendants
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
and HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TINA WALTER, CHRISTOPHER BAYLESS,
and ERIC SCHUMACHER, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
v.
14
15
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and
HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC,
16
CASE NO.: 09-CV-02136 SC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF
SETTLEMENT AND CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
The Honorable Samuel Conti
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION HEARING AND CMC
CASE NO.: 09-CV-02136 SC
\\058224/000230 - 105453 v1
1
Plaintiffs Tina Walter, Christopher Bayless, and Eric Schumacher and Defendants Hughes
2
3
stipulate to, and seek th
4
Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Amended Settlement Agreement and for a Case
5
Management Conference:
6
WHEREAS, on November 21, 2011, the Court entered an Order, pursuant to t
7
stipulation, providing for the Plaintiffs to file a Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Amended
8
Settlement Agreement on or before December 7, 2011, and extending time for Defendants to
9
respond to the Second Amended Complaint;
10
WHEREAS, the parties, after consulting
Calendar Clerk and Courtroom
11
Deputy, stipulate
12
Settlement Agreement and the Case management Conference, previously scheduled for
13
November 29, 2011, shall be continued to February 10, 2012 at 10 a.m.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION HEARING AND CMC
CASE NO.: 09-CV-02136 SC
\\058224/000230 - 105453 v1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties through their respective
counsel, that:
1. The
Settlement Agreement shall be on February 10, 2012 at 10 a.m.
2. The Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for November 29, 2011, shall
be continued to February 10, 2012 at 10 a.m.
8
9
10
Dated: November 22, 2011
11
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
By:
12
13
/s/____________
Robert B. Hawk
Attorneys for Defendants
HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and
HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS LLC
14
15
BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER &
BIRKHAEUSER, LLP
16
17
18
By:
19
20
/s/ __________
Jennifer S. Rosenberg
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
21
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
D
_____________________________________
RDERE
S SO O
IT I
R NIA
25
UNIT
ED
28
Dated: November ___, 2011
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI
Judge S
RT
27
onti
amuel C
NO
26
2
A
H
ER
28
FO
24
S
23
LI
22
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION HEARING AND CMC
CASE NO.: 09-CV-02136 SC
\\058224/000230 - 105453 v1
1
I, Robert B. Hawk, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
2
STIPULATI
3
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND CASE
4
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest
5
that
concurred in this filing.
6
7
DATED: November 22, 2011
HOGAN LOVELLS LLP
8
By
9
/s/
Robert B. Hawk
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION HEARING AND CMC
CASE NO.: 09-CV-02136 SC
\\058224/000230 - 105453 v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?