Walter et al v. Hughes Communications, Inc. et al

Filing 97

STIPULATION AND ORDER Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Amended Settlement Agreement Hearing set for 2/10/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. Case Management Conference set for 11/29/11 is continued to 2/10/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 11/28/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Robert B. Hawk (SBN 118054) J. Christopher Mitchell (SBN 215639) HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 525 University Avenue, 4th Floor Palo Alto, California 94301 Telephone: (650) 463-4000 Facsimile: (650) 463-4199 robert.hawk@hoganlovells.com chris.mitchell@hoganlovells.com Attorneys for Defendants HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TINA WALTER, CHRISTOPHER BAYLESS, and ERIC SCHUMACHER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 15 HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC, 16 CASE NO.: 09-CV-02136 SC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE The Honorable Samuel Conti Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION HEARING AND CMC CASE NO.: 09-CV-02136 SC \\058224/000230 - 105453 v1 1 Plaintiffs Tina Walter, Christopher Bayless, and Eric Schumacher and Defendants Hughes 2 3 stipulate to, and seek th 4 Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Amended Settlement Agreement and for a Case 5 Management Conference: 6 WHEREAS, on November 21, 2011, the Court entered an Order, pursuant to t 7 stipulation, providing for the Plaintiffs to file a Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Amended 8 Settlement Agreement on or before December 7, 2011, and extending time for Defendants to 9 respond to the Second Amended Complaint; 10 WHEREAS, the parties, after consulting Calendar Clerk and Courtroom 11 Deputy, stipulate 12 Settlement Agreement and the Case management Conference, previously scheduled for 13 November 29, 2011, shall be continued to February 10, 2012 at 10 a.m. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION HEARING AND CMC CASE NO.: 09-CV-02136 SC \\058224/000230 - 105453 v1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the Parties through their respective counsel, that: 1. The Settlement Agreement shall be on February 10, 2012 at 10 a.m. 2. The Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for November 29, 2011, shall be continued to February 10, 2012 at 10 a.m. 8 9 10 Dated: November 22, 2011 11 HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP By: 12 13 /s/____________ Robert B. Hawk Attorneys for Defendants HUGHES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS LLC 14 15 BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER & BIRKHAEUSER, LLP 16 17 18 By: 19 20 /s/ __________ Jennifer S. Rosenberg Attorneys for Plaintiffs 21 PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. D _____________________________________ RDERE S SO O IT I R NIA 25 UNIT ED 28 Dated: November ___, 2011 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O THE HONORABLE SAMUEL CONTI Judge S RT 27 onti amuel C NO 26 2 A H ER 28 FO 24 S 23 LI 22 N F D IS T IC T O R C STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION HEARING AND CMC CASE NO.: 09-CV-02136 SC \\058224/000230 - 105453 v1 1 I, Robert B. Hawk, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 2 STIPULATI 3 MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND CASE 4 MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest 5 that concurred in this filing. 6 7 DATED: November 22, 2011 HOGAN LOVELLS LLP 8 By 9 /s/ Robert B. Hawk 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION HEARING AND CMC CASE NO.: 09-CV-02136 SC \\058224/000230 - 105453 v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?