Jackson et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 101

CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/23/2012 10:00 AM.; Pretrial Conference set for 2/14/2013 10:00 AM; Jury Selection set for 2/25/2013 09:00 AM; Jury Trial set for 2/25/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/18/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2011)

Download PDF
*E-Filed 11/18/11* 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 8 12 ESPANOLA JACKSON, et al. 13 14 Plaintiffs, v. No. C 09-02143 RS CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 15 CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., 16 17 18 19 Defendant. ____________________________________/ Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties attended a Case 20 Management Conference on November 17, 2011. After considering the Joint Case Management 21 Statement submitted by the parties and consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and 22 good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 23 1. 24 On or before August 15, 2012, all non-expert discovery shall be completed by the parties. DISCOVERY. 25 Discovery shall be limited as follows: (a) ten (10) non-expert depositions per party; (b) twenty-five 26 (25) interrogatories per party, including all discrete subparts; (c) a reasonable number of requests 27 for production of documents or for inspection per party; and (d) a reasonable number of requests for 28 admission per party. CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2. EXPERT WITNESSES. The disclosure and discovery of expert witness opinions shall proceed as follows: A. On or before September 1, 2012, plaintiff shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2). B. On or before September 15, 2012, defendant shall disclose expert testimony and reports in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2). C. On or before October 1, 2012, all discovery of expert witnesses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(4) shall be completed. 5. FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. A Further Case Management Conference shall be held on August 23, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. The parties shall file a 12 Joint Case Management Statement at least one week prior to the Conference. 13 14 15 6. PRETRIAL MOTIONS. All pretrial motions must be filed and served pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7. All pretrial motions shall be heard no later than December 13, 2012. 7. PRETRIAL STATEMENTS. At a time convenient to both, counsel shall meet and 16 confer to discuss preparation of a joint pretrial statement, and on or before January 31, 2013, 17 counsel shall file a Joint Pretrial Statement. 18 8. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. The final pretrial conference will be held on February 19 14, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate 20 Avenue, San Francisco, California. Each party or lead counsel who will try the case shall attend 21 personally. 22 9. TRIAL DATE. Trial shall commence on February 25, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., in 23 Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, 24 California. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 28 2 1 2 DATED: 11/18/11 _______________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?