Jackson et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 69

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND REQUEST FURTHER BRIEFING. Motion Hearing set for 4/28/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/8/11. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2011)

Jackson et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Doc. 69

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

**E-filed 4/8/11**

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ESPANOLA JACKSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________/

No. C 09-2143 RS ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND REQUESTING FURTHER BRIEFING

In this action, plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of three San Francisco Police Code ("SFPC") sections regulating firearms and ammunition. Defendants have moved to dismiss, contending that plaintiffs lack standing and that the claims are not ripe. After the motion was filed, one of the three challenged SFPC sections was amended in a manner that defendants contend addresses plaintiffs' complaints, and thereby moots the controversy as to that section.1 In light of this development, the hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss is continued to April 28, 2011. No

Plaintiffs apparently were unaware that the amendment had taken effect shortly before they filed their opposition.

1

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

later than April 15, 2011, plaintiffs shall file a supplemental brief, not to exceed seven pages, setting forth their position on the effect of the amendment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 4/8/11 RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

2