Sullivan v. Washington Mutual Bank FA et al
Filing
103
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC re 102 Stipulation filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, Bank of America, N.A., California Reconveyance Company Case Management Statement due by 4/4/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/11/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/11/13. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2013)
1
THEODORE E. BACON (CA Bar No. 115395)
tbacon@AlvaradoSmith.com
2
ALVARADOSMITH
3
4
A Professional Corporation
235 Pine Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: (415) 624-8665
Fax: (415) 391-1751
5
6
7
8
Attorneys for Defendants
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CALIFORNIA
RECONVEYANCE COMPANY and BANK OF AMERICA,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as successor by merger to LaSalle
Bank NA as trustee for WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2006-AR9 Trust
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
A LVARADO S MITH
A P ROFESSIONAL C ORPORATI ON
S AN F RA NCISCO
11
12
KATY SULLIVAN, also known as KATY
MARIE SULLIVAN,
CASE NO.: CV 09-2161 EMC
JUDGE:
13
Hon. Edward M. Chen
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ; ORDER
14
v.
15
16
17
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA, JP
MORGAN CHASE BANK, National
Association, BANK OF AMERICA, National
Association, CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE
COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
DATE:
TIME:
CRTRM:
January 17, 2013
10:30 a.m.
5
ACTION FILED:
18
April 22, 2009
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
3409196.1 -- AL109.W383
CASE NO. CV 09-2161 EMC
1
Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”), California Reconveyance Company
2
(“CRC”) and Bank of America, National Association, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank NA
3
as trustee for WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR9 Trust (“B of A”)
4
(together, “Defendants”), along with plaintiff Katy Sullivan (“Plaintiff”)(collectively the “Parties”),
5
hereby stipulate to continue the January 17, 2013 Case Management Conference to April 11, 2013 at
6
10:30 am.
7
The reason for the request is that the parties have entered into a conditional settlement of the
entire case. The settlement contemplates a tender of a Deed in lieu of foreclosure on one of the two
9
condominium units owned by Plaintiff and a loan modification on the other unit in which Plaintiff
10
now resides. The financial terms of the loan modification and all other terms of the settlement have
11
A LVARADO S MITH
A P ROFESSIONAL C ORPORATI ON
S AN F RA NCISCO
8
been agreed upon, but it will take 60-75 days to confirm that title to both units is clear, to obtain
12
income verification and to submit all documentation required to process the loan modification. The
13
settlement provides that assuming, as both parties believe, that these issue are resolved, then the loan
14
modification agreement will be executed, the Deed in lieu recorded and the parties will submit a
15
request for dismissal with prejudice of the entire action.
16
17
The parties therefore respectfully stipulate to and ask the Court to continue the current CMC
from 1/17/13 to 4/11/13, time to remain at 10:30 am.
18
19
DATED: January 9, 2013
ALVARADOSMITH
A Professional Corporation
20
22
O ORD
IT IS S
_________________
Edward M. Chen
U.S. District Judge E
RT
28
FO
27
By: /s/ J. Brian McCauley
en J. BRIAN MCCAULEY, ESQ..
d M. Ch
e Edwar
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Judg
KATY SULLIVAN
H
LI
IT IS SO ORDERED:
NO
26
RN
A
25
UNIT
ED
24
RT
U
O
S
23
By: /s/ Theodore E. Bacon
THEODORE E. BACON
Attorneys for Defendants
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
S DISTRICT
TE
C CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY
TA
and BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION
DATED: January 9, 2013
D
ERE
R NIA
21
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
2
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
3409196.1 -- AL109.W383
CASE NO. CV 09-2161 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?