Sullivan v. Washington Mutual Bank FA et al

Filing 22

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 Stipulation filed by Katy Sullivan. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/20/09. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2009)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-02161-EMC Document21 Filed07/17/09 Page1 of 3 ORDER 30 Case3:09-cv-02161-EMC Document21 Filed07/17/09 Page2 of 3 IT IS SO ORDERED: UNIT ED Edward M. Chen U.S. Magistrate Judge S S DISTRICT TE C __________________ TA ER N D IS T IC T R OF A C LI FO dward Judge E M. Che n R NIA DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO RT U O NO RT H Case3:09-cv-02161-EMC Document21 Filed07/17/09 Page3 of 3 1 2 3 PROOF OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, hereby declare: I am a citizen of the United States, over 18 years of age, and not a party to the within 4 action. I am employed in the County of San Francisco; my business address is One Market Street, Suite 1600, San Francisco, CA 94105. 5 On July 17, 2009, I served the within: 6 7 Stipulation Allowing Filing of First Amended Complaint 8 on all parties in this action, as addressed below, by causing a true copy thereof to be distributed as follows: 9 Patrick Cathcart, Esq. 10 Adorno Yoss Alvarado & Smith A Professional Corporation 11 633 W. Fifth Street, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 12 [X] BY MAIL: The above referenced documents were personally deposited by me in 13 the U.S. mail with the U.S. Postal Service on the day stated above with U.S., First-class postage thereon fully prepaid. 14 [] BY FAX: I caused such documents to be transmitted via facsimile to the stated 15 parties at their respective facsimile numbers. 16 [ ] 17 18 BY EXPRESS CARRIER I caused such documents to be collected by an agent for [company name] to be delivered to the offices of stated parties. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. 19 20 Dated: July 17, 2009 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 -1PROOF OF SERIVICE Brian McCauley

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?