Sullivan v. Washington Mutual Bank FA et al

Filing 66

ORDER RESETTING CMC re 64 Joint Case Management Statement filed by Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase Bank, California Reconveyance Company Status Report due by 6/8/2011. Status Conference set for 6/15/2011 02:30 PM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/3/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A PROFE SSIONA L C OR POR ATI ON LOS ANGELES THEODORE E. BACON (CA Bar No. 115395) tbacon@AlvaradoSmith.com RICK D. NAVARRETTE (CA Bar No. 122653) rnavarrette@AlvaradoSmith.com AMY L. MORSE (CA Bar No. 92135) amorse@AlvaradoSmith.com PATRICIO A. MARQUEZ (CA Bar No. 230694) pmarquez@AlvaradoSmith.com ALVARADOSMITH A Professional Corporation 633 W. Fifth Street, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel: (213) 229-2400 Fax: (213) 229-2499 Attorneys for Defendants JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY and BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank NA as trustee for WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR9 Trust UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA A LVARADO S MIT H 14 15 16 17 Plaintiff, 18 v. 19 20 21 22 KATY SULLIVAN, also known as KATY MARIE SULLIVAN, CASE NO.: CV 09-2161 EMC JUDGE: Hon. Edward M. Chen UPDATED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT ; ORDER RESETTING CMC DATE: TIME: CRTRM: March 9, 2011 2:30 p.m. C WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, National Association, BANK OF AMERICA, National Association, CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 /// /// /// /// UPDATED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 2077567.2 Action Filed: April 22, 2009 CASE NO. CV 09-2161 EMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A PROFE SSIONA L C OR POR ATI ON LOS ANGELES TO THE CLERK OF THE ABOVE-ENTITLED COURT: Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("JPMorgan"), California Reconveyance Company ("CRC") and Bank of America, National Association, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank NA as trustee for WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR9 Trust ("B of A") (together, "Defendants"), along with plaintiff Katy Sullivan ("Plaintiff")(collectively the "Parties"), hereby submit this Updated Joint Case Management Statement. 1. Jurisdiction and Service Plaintiff has named the following as defendants: WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, National Association, BANK OF AMERICA, National Association, LASALLE BANK, National Association, CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY; and Does 1 through 50, inclusive. This court has jurisdiction, because Plaintiff, in the initial complaint, alleges violations of the Federal Truth in Lending Act ("TILA"). (See Second Amended Complaint.) 2. Status of the Case and Changes Since Previous Joint Statement: Plaintiff seeks statutory damages under TILA, as well as general damages. Plaintiff also seeks rescission under TILA. According to Plaintiff, Defendants failed to make certain disclosures required under the TILA at the time the subject loan was issued to Plaintiff, and thereafter. Plaintiff also contends that Defendants falsely represented the nature of the subject loan. Defendants deny these allegations and contend that they did not participate in the origination process which is the subject of Plaintiff's legal action. A. Motions: A LVARADO S MIT H 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants may bring a motion for summary judgment pursuant to FRCP 56. B. Discovery: The parties have exchanged limited written discovery, however such discovery is currently stayed in order to attempt sale of one unit of the property's two condominium and thereafter resolve the action. Discovery, as a result, is not pending as to do so would be to expand attorney's fees hopefully unnecessarily. /// 1 UPDATED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 2077567.2 CASE NO. CV 09-2161 EMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A PROFE SSIONA L C OR POR ATI ON LOS ANGELES C. Settlement and ADR: The parties have made efforts to mediate and settle the matter, and there is passive agreement that the best avenue for potential settlement is to market one of the two existing, approved condominium units at the property, both of which are approved, legal condominium units. Upon a sale, the parties will embark on settlement negotiations in an attempt to resolve the remaining issues in this litigation based, in part, on a partial pay-down of the outstanding subject bank loan from the net sale proceeds of the unit. Plaintiff reports in this Joint Statement that one unit of the property has been marketed for sale, since soon after the most recent Case Management Conference. Plaintiff and one set of prospective buyers were in negotiation for a purchase; since those buyers were the existing occupants of that unit, they were believed to present the most promising potential buyer (they had expressed interest in the unit prior to the parties' existing settlement posture herein). Unfortunately, that sale negotiation fell through within the past week as a result of an inability to arrive at agreed terms for the construction of a garage in the basement area of the building. The large financial expenditure necessary to do so made the sale essentially unavailable. Plaintiff is continuing with her marketing efforts, including an open house within the past week, together with a price reduction. A showing of the house occurred on Sunday, February 28, and 11 parties came through the listed condominium. Although no offers have yet resulted from that particular showing, simply the number of interested parties is seen to be a positive indication. /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// 2 UPDATED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 2077567.2 A LVARADO S MIT H 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. CV 09-2161 EMC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A PROFE SSIONA L C OR POR ATI ON LOS ANGELES The parties have conferred regarding their desired processing of this litigation in view of the above information. It is believed by both that a continued period for marketing of the property is in the likely best interest of both sides and so jointly request the court to continue this case management conference for a further 90 days to see what developments may be attainable in the sale of the condominium unit. It is believed the economy is improving, albeit slowly, and that a further 90 days is a reasonable period of time to continue with sale efforts. Respectfully submitted, DATED: March 2, 2011 By: /s/ J. Brian McCauley J. BRIAN MCCAULEY, ESQ.. Attorneys for Plaintiff, KATY SULLIVAN DATED: March 2, 2011 A LVARADO S MIT H 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ALVARADOSMITH A Professional Corporation By: /s/ Patricio A. Marquez PATRICIO A. MARQUEZ Attorneys for Defendants JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY and BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank NA as trustee for WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2006-AR9 Trust IT IS SO ORDERED that the status conference set for 3/9/11 at 2:30 p.m. is reset for 6/15/11 at 2:30 p.m. An updated joint status report shall be filed by 6/8/11. C _____________________AT T Edward M. Chen RED U.S. Magistrate Judge IT IS SO ORDEED IFI AS MO Dated: __3/2/11_____________D ISTRIC ES D T RT U O UNIT ED S ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO Judge E dward M . Chen R NIA UPDATED JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT 2077567.2 NO RT H 3 CASE NO. CV 09-2161 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?