Lee v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan

Filing 35

ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Docket No. 30] (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. v. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Defendant. / PAMELA LEE, Plaintiff, No. C 09-02176 SI ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Docket No. 30] IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Defendant has filed a motion seeking extension of the briefing schedule and continuance of the hearing date on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff does not oppose an extension, but expresses concern that the discovery process will not proceed smoothly in the intervening time without guidelines from the Court. Accordingly, the Court hereby rules as follows: 1. The current briefing schedule and hearing date for the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment are hereby VACATED. Oral argument on the parties' crossmotions for summary judgment will be heard on Friday, June 25, 2010, and the briefing schedule is extended accordingly. Defendant must respond to all discovery propounded by plaintiff within 20 days. In the event defendant asserts an objection, the parties must meet and confer to resolve their dispute, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 and Local Rule 37. If the parties are unable to resolve their dispute after good faith efforts to do so, plaintiff may file a motion to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 compel in compliance with the Local Rules and the Court's standing order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 1, 2010 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?