Lee v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan

Filing 57

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2010)

Lee v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan

Doc. 57

1 2 3 4

Laurence F. Padway (SBN 083914) Law Offices of Laurence F. Padway 1516 Oak Street, Suite 109 Alameda, CA 94501 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Pamela Lee

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 1 of 3 PAMELA LEE Plaintiff, vs. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Defendant, and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Real Party in Interest Whereas, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was due on October 11, 2010; and Case No. C09-02176 SI STIPULATION AND (PROPOSED) ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE Hon. Susan Illston SEDGWICK, DETERT, MORAN & ARNOLD LLP REBECCA A. HULL Bar No. 99802 [e-mail] One Market Plaza Steuart Tower, 8th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant Kaiser Permanente Welfare Benefit Plan, incorrectly sued as Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Long Term Disability Plan; and Real Party in Interest Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Whereas, counsel for plaintiff spent over 50 hours preparing this brief, and while he had planned to file it yesterday, parts of it took longer to write than anticipated as a result of which, it was not completed until shortly after 5 a.m. this morning, after which the table of contents and table of authorities were added, and the document was ready for filing by 11 a.m.;

Now, therefore, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby jointly stipulate to the following modification of the current briefing schedule, which extends the briefing by one business day, at the request of the plaintiff:

Plaintiff's opening brief due Defendants' opposition and cross motion due: Plaintiff's reply and opposition to cross motion due: Defendants' reply due: Hearing on cross motions:

October 12, 2010 October 26, 2010 November 9, 2010 November 23, 2010 December 20, 2010

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 18 19 20 21 22 DATED: October 12, 2010 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 3 /s/ Rebecca A. Hull ____________________________ Rebecca A. Hull Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold LLP Attorneys for Deloitte and Touche USA LLP Plan, and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company DATED: October 12, 2010 /s/ Laurence F. Padway ____________________________ Laurence F. Padway Law Offices of Laurence F. Padway Attorneys for plaintiff

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: Hon. Susan Illston United States District Court Judge

Page 3 of 3