Williams v. Astrue
Filing
12
STIPULATION AND ORDER extending deadline to 2/12/2010 for plaintiff to file summary judgment motion; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 1/14/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Rosemary Dady SBN# 190174 The Hawkins Center of Rubicon Programs 101 Broadway Ave. Richmond, California 94804 (510) 232-6611 (phone) (510) 232-2271 (fax) Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Brenda Williams, vs. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
CIVIL NO. 09-2183 MHP STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the undersigned attorneys, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-12, and subject to the approval of the Court, that plaintiff may have an extension of 30 days in which to file his Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 Plaintiff's motion was due on January 13, 2010, pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-5. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is now due on February 12, 2010. // // // // // // // //
1. See attached Declaration of Rosemary Dady on behalf of Brenda Williams.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
// This is Plaintiff's first request for an extension.
Dated: January 13, 2010
____/S/______________________________ Rosemary Dady Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: January 13, 2010
_____/S/_______________________________ Dennis J. Hanna Special Assistant United States Attorney
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
UNIT ED
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 1/14/2010
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
A
C
LI
FO
___________________________________ MARILYN H. PATEL l H. Pate United States District Judge Marilyn Judge
R NIA
OO IT IS S
RDERE
D
RT U O
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?