Gundersen v. Lennar Associates Management, LLC et al

Filing 122

ORDER allowing filing of counterclaim re 67 Stipulation filed by Lennar Associates Management, LLC. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/21/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cindi L. Pusateri (CA State Bar No. 216899) [e-mail] Hien Nguyen (CA State Bar No. 229794) [e-mail] MEYER WHITE LLP 515 S. Flower Street, Suite 3600 Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Julia Lynn Nye (CA State Bar No. 160092) [e-mail] Ted D. Meyer (Pro Hac Vice) (TX State Bar No. 13997500) [e-mail] MEYER WHITE LLP 600 Travis Street, Suite 900 Houston, TX 77002 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants Lennar Associates Management, LLC and Lennar Corporation dba Lennar Homes UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ERIC GUNDERSEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. LENNAR ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENT, LLC; LENNAR CORPORATION, dba LENNAR HOMES; and DOES 1- 10, inclusive, Defendants. No. C-09-02270 CRB [PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING FILING OF DEFENDANT LENNAR ASSOCIATES MANAGEMENT LLC'S COUNTERCLAIM

Upon consideration of the parties' Stipulation Concerning the Filing of Defendant's Counterclaim ("Stipulation"), and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant Lennar Associates Management, LLC ("Defendant") shall be allowed to

file a Counterclaim, in the form attached as Exhibit 1 to the parties' Stipulation. The Counterclaim [PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING THE FILING OF -1DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIMNo. C-09-02270 CRB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

is deemed served and filed on the date of entry of this Order. 2. Plaintiff shall answer or otherwise respond to Defendant's Counterclaim within

thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. 3. The filing of Defendant's Counterclaim merely supplements the operative Answer

in this action, and Defendant's responses and affirmative and other defenses alleged in the operative Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint remain in effect. See Docket Entry Nos. 1-2 and 1.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,

UNIT ED

S

Dated: June 21, 2010 ____________

19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ALLOWING THE FILING OF DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIMNo. C-09-02270 CRB

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-2-

A

18

ER

C

LI

FO

17

harle Judge C

s R. Bre

yer

R NIA

By: The Honorable Charles R. Breyer United States District Judge ERED ORD Northern District IS California T of SO

S DISTRICT TE C TA _______________________________

RT U O

I

NO

RT

H