Bologna et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 17

ORDER Granting re #16 Stipulation Resetting Rule 26 Deadlines for Rescheduled Case Management Conference and Hearing on Moton to Dimiss, filed by Gavin Newson, William Sifferman, City and County of San Francisco, Heather Fong, Set/Reset Deadlines Rule 26 Conference and ADR stiplation: 8/28/09; serve initial disclosure and joint CMC statement: 9/8/09.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 8/7/09. (fj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER, State Bar #114961 Chief Trial Deputy SCOTT D. WIENER, State Bar #189266 MEREDITH B. OSBORN, State Bar #250467 Deputy City Attorneys 1390 Market Street, 7th Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, GAVIN NEWSOM, HEATHER FONG, AND WILLIAM SIFFERMANN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANIELLE BOLOGNA, individually and as the successor-in-interest to ANTHONY BOLOGNA, MICHAEL BOLOGNA and MATTHEW BOLOGNA; ANDREW BOLOGNA, and FRANCESCA BOLOGNA, by-and-through her guardian ad litem DANIELLE BOLOGNA, Plaintiffs, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a public entity; GAVIN NEWSOM, an individual; HEATHER FONG, an individual; WILLIAM SIFFERMAN; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. CV-09-2272 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESETTING RULE 26 DEADLINES IN LIGHT OF RESCHEDULED CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
Bologna, et al. v. CCSF, et al. ­ USDC No. CV-09-2272 SI

1

n:\lit\li2009\090237\00573571.doc

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WHEREAS the Court recently continued the initial case management conference in this matter to September 15, 2009; WHEREAS Defendants' Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss is set for hearing on August 14, 2009; AND WHEREAS the parties believe that it would be most efficient to continue the deadlines for the parties' Rule 26 pre-CMC obligations to dates after the motion hearing and closer in time to the CMC; THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND STIPULATE, subject to approval by the Court, as follows: 1. The parties' deadline to conduct a Rule 26 conference and to file an ADR stipulation

shall be continued to August 28, 2009. 2. The parties' deadline to serve initial disclosures and to file a joint case management

statement shall be continued to September 8, 2009.

Dated: August 6, 2009 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER Chief Trial Deputy SCOTT D. WIENER MEREDITH B. OSBORN Deputy City Attorneys -/s/By: SCOTT D. WIENER Attorneys for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, GAVIN NEWSOM, HEATHER FONG, AND WILLIAM SIFFERMANN Scott D. Wiener

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
Bologna, et al. v. CCSF, et al. ­ USDC No. CV-09-2272 SI

2

n:\lit\li2009\090237\00573571.doc

1 2 3

Dated: August 6, 2009 LAW OFFICES OF WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY & SCHOENBERGER -/s/Matthew D. Davis

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

By: MATTHEW D. DAVIS Attorneys for Plaintiffs DANIELLE BOLOGNA, ANDREW BOLOGNA, and FRANCESCA BOLOGNA *Pursuant to GO 45, the electronic signatory has obtained approval from this signatory. SO ORDERED.

UNIT ED

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

3

A

C

Bologna, et al. v. CCSF, et al. ­ USDC No. CV-09-2272 SI

LI
n:\lit\li2009\090237\00573571.doc

FO

R NIA

August 7, 2009 Dated: _____________

_______________________________ HON. SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES san Illston JUDGE DISTRICT u Judge S

I

ORD T IS SO

ERED

RT U O

NO

RT
H