Conceptus, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.

Filing 141

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION REGARDING ASSERTED CLAIMS. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 19, 2010. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2010)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-02280-WHA Document140 Filed01/19/10 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EDWARD R. REINES (STATE BAR NO. 135960) edward.reines@weil.com NICHOLAS A. BROWN (STATE BAR NO. 198210) nick.brown@weil.com PAUL T. EHRLICH (STATE BAR NO. 228543) paul.ehrlich@weil.com JILL J. HO (STATE BAR NO. 236349) jill.ho@weil.com L. OKEY ONYEJEKWE, JR. (STATE BAR NO. 250354) okey.onyejekwe@weil.com WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP Silicon Valley Office 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 M. PATRICIA THAYER (STATE BAR NO. 90818) pthayer@orrick.com KATHLEEN D. PATTERSON (STATE BAR NO. 124768) kpatterson@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP The Orrick Building 405 Howard Street San Francisco, CA 94105-2669 Telephone: (415) 773-5700 Facsimile: (415) 773-5759 Attorneys for Plaintiff CONCEPTUS INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CONCEPTUS INC., Plaintiff, v. HOLOGIC, INC., Defendant. Case No. 09-cv-02280-WHA STIPULATION REGARDING ASSERTED CLAIMS AND JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS PERTAINING TO UNASSERTED PATENTS AND CLAIMS AND ORDER Complaint Filed: 5/22/09 Trial Date: None Set The Honorable William H. Alsup CASE NO. 09-CV-02280-WHA Case3:09-cv-02280-WHA Document140 Filed01/19/10 Page2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Conceptus, Inc. ("Conceptus") and Defendant Hologic, Inc. ("Hologic") hereby stipulate that Conceptus shall restrict its claims of infringement and Hologic shall restrict its claims of invalidity to Claims 8, 37, and 38 of U.S. Patent No. 6,634,361 ("the '361 patent") and Claims 5 and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 7,506,650 ("the '650 patent"). Accordingly, Conceptus and Hologic jointly request that the Court dismiss with prejudice the claims and counterclaims brought by both parties pertaining to U.S. Patent Nos. 6,709,667, 7237,552, and 7,428,904 and the claims and counterclaims brought by both parties pertaining to the '361 and '650 patents with the exception of Claims 8, 37 and 38 of the '361 patent and claims 5 and 14 of the '650 patent. Neither side will make reference to a jury that the dismissed patents and claims were once asserted in the case. Nor will either party argue that, by dismissing these claims, Conceptus is precluded from asserting infringement in this case of the non-withdrawn claims. Hologic shall have the right to reassert its invalidity counterclaims in the event of any future claims of infringement permissible hereunder of the dismissed patents and claims. Dated: January 19, 2010 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE By: /s/ M. Patricia Thayer M. Patricia Thayer Attorneys for Plaintiff Conceptus, Inc. Dated: January 19, 2010 HOWREY LLP By: /s/ Matthew M. Wolf Matthew M. Wolf Attorneys for Defendant Hologic, Inc. ISTRIC ES D TC AT T IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 Dated: January ____, 2010 UNIT ED RT U O 1 ER N C F Case No. 09-cv-02280-WHA D IS T IC T O R A LI FO Judge W lsup illiam A R NIA D RDERE _______________________________ IS SO O IT Hon. William H. Alsup United States District Judge NO S RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?