Conceptus, Inc. v. Hologic, Inc.

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 7/16/2009. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGE] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CONCEPTUS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff, v. HOLOGIC, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Case No. C 09-02280 WHA JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No 09-02280 WHA JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO ANSWER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT DM_US:22272909_1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Conceptus, Inc. ("Conceptus") and Defendant Hologic, Inc. ("Hologic") hereby submit this Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order under Civil Local Rule 7-12 requesting an extension for Hologic to file its answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint in this matter. The current deadline for response to the First Amended Complaint is July 29, 2009. The parties stipulate and agree that Hologic may have an extension until August 25, 2009, to file its answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint, and request that the Court so order. No extensions have previously been requested or received in this matter. 1 Case No 09-02280 WHA JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO ANSWER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT DM_US:22272909_1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: July 15, 2009 BAKER & McKENZIE LLP HOWREY LLP By:/s/Howard N. Wisnia Howard N. Wisnia Attorneys for CONCEPTUS, INC. By:/s/Katharine L. Altemus Katharine L. Altemus Attorneys for HOLOGIC, INC. Howard N. Wisnia (SBN 184626) James P. Conley (SBN 216639) April M. Wurster (SBN 228038) BAKER & McKENZIE LLP 12544 High Bluff Drive, Third Floor San Diego, CA 92130-3051 Telephone: +1 858 523 6200 Facsimile: +1 858 259 8290 howard.n.wisnia@bakernet.com james.p.conley@bakernet.com april.m.wurster@bakernet.com Attorneys for Plaintiff CONCEPTUS, INC. Katharine L. Altemus (SBN 227080; altemusk@howrey.com) HOWREY LLP 1950 University Avenue, 4th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 798-3500 Facsimile: (650) 798-3600 Robert Ruyak Matthew M. Wolf HOWREY LLP 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Telephone: (202) 783-0800 Facsimile: (202) 383-6610 Jennifer A. Sklenar (SBN 200434; sklenarj@howrey.com) Wallace W. Wu (SBN 220110; wuw@howrey.com) HOWREY LLP 550 S. Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 892-1800 Facsimile: (213) 892-2300 Attorneys for Defendant HOLOGIC, INC. // 2 Case No 09-02280 WHA JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO ANSWER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT DM_US:22272909_1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No 09-02280 WHA JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO ANSWER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT DM_US:22272909_1 ATTESTATION UNDER GENERAL ORDER NO. 45 § X.B. As required by General Order No. 45, § X.B., I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from the other signatory to this Stipulation. By:/s/Katharine L. Altemus Katharine L. Altemus PROPOSED ORDER Pursuant to STIPULATION, it is SO ORDERED. The period within which Defendant Hologic, Inc. shall file a responsive pleading or motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 is extended until August 25, 2009. Dated: July 16, 2009. _____________________________________ S DISTRICT TE UNITEDA STATES DISTRICT JUDGE C UNIT ED S T RT U O up ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO liam Als dge Wil Ju R NIA VED APPRO NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?