Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 177

Proposed Order re #174 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Administrative Leave to Exceed Page Limitations by Paul T. Katami, Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Jeffrey J. Zarrillo. (Olson, Theodore) (Filed on 9/10/2009)

Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Doc. 177

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document177

Filed09/10/09 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Theodore B. Olson, SBN 38137 [e-mail] Matthew D. McGill, pro hac vice Amir C. Tayrani, SBN 229609 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone] Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., SBN 132009 [e-mail] Christopher D. Dusseault, SBN 177557 Ethan D. Dettmer, SBN 196046 Sarah E. Piepmeier, SBN 227094 Theane Evangelis Kapur, SBN 243570 Enrique A. Monagas, SBN 239087 333 S. Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone] BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Boies, pro hac vice [e-mail] Theodore H. Uno, SBN 248603 333 Main Street, Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO, Plaintiffs, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, in his official capacity as Governor of California; EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. HORTON, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health and State Registrar of Vital Statistics; LINETTE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Deputy Director of Health Information & Strategic Planning for the California Department of Public Health; PATRICK O'CONNELL, in his official capacity as Clerk-Recorder for the County of Alameda; and DEAN C. LOGAN, in his official capacity as Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk for the County of Los Angeles, Defendants.
09-CV-2292 VRW [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS Dockets.Justia.com

CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS Judge: Chief Judge Walker Location: Courtroom 6, 17th Floor

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document177

Filed09/10/09 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

Defendant-Intervenors Dennis Hollingsworth, Gail J. Knight, Martin F. Gutierrez, Hak-Shing William Tam, Mark A. Jansson, and ProtectMarriage.com ­ Yes on 8, A Project of California Renewal ("Defendant-Intervenors") moved under this Court's Civil Local Rule 7-11 for an order permitting them to file a motion for summary judgment with a 100-page long memorandum of points and authorities in support. Doc #172. The motion for administrative relief is opposed by the Plaintiffs. Doc #174. The Court hereby orders that Defendant-Intervenors' motion for administrative leave to exceed page limitations is DENIED. Defendant-Intervenors did not obtain an order--or even seek an order--permitting the filing of an over length brief prior to the deadline for filing their motion for summary judgment, as is required by this Court's Local Rules. See Civ. L.R. 7-2(b); 7-4(b) & 7-11. In light of this fact, and the expedited schedule in this case, the Court also hereby DENIES Defendant-Intervenors' request to deem their proposed motion for summary judgment filed as of September 9, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: _____________ The Honorable Vaughn R. Walker Chief Judge of the United States District Court

1
09-CV-2292 VRW [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE LEAVE TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATIONS