Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 258

Minute Entry: TelephonicDiscovery Hearing held on 11/19/2009 before Joseph C. Spero re: docket nos. 256 and 257. (Court Reporter Kathy Sullivan.) (klh, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 11/19/2009)

Download PDF
Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al Doc. 258 Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document258 Filed11/19/09 Page1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTE ORDER CASE NO. C 09-02292 VRW (JCS) CASE NAME: KRISTIN M. PERRY v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPH C. SPERO DATE: November 19, 2009 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF: Matthew D. McGill - Plas Mollie Lee - Pla Intv CCSF TIME: 34 M COURTROOM DEPUTY: Karen Hom COURT REPORTER: Kathy Sullivan COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT: Nicole Moss- Dft-Intv Prop 8 Andrew Stroud -Admin Dfts Tamar Pachter - Dft AG Ed Brown PROCEEDINGS: RULING: 1. Telephonic Discovery Hearing re: Docket Nos. Submitted 256 and 257 _________________________________________________________________________ ORDERED AFTER HEARING: Parties shall meet and confer on an expedited basis today and tomorrow to negotiate a stipulated protective order. If the parties cannot come to an agreement on the stipulated protective order, the Court will enter it's own protective order. __________________________________________________________________________ ORDER TO BE PREPARED BY: () Plaintiff () Defendant (X) Court CASE CONTINUED TO: ___________________________________________________________________________ Number of Depos: Expert Disclosure: Motions Hearing: Number of Experts: Expert Rebuttal: at 9:30 a.m. Discovery Cutoff: Expert Discovery Cutoff: Pretrial Conference: at 1:30 p.m. Trial Date: cc: Chambers; Karen * (T) = Telephonic Appearance at 8:30 a.m. ()Jury ()Court Set for days __________________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?