Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 487

Proposed Order re #485 MOTION to Shorten Time by Paul T. Katami, Kristin M. Perry, Sandra B. Stier, Jeffrey J. Zarrillo. (Dettmer, Ethan) (Filed on 1/19/2010)

Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Doc. 487

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document487

Filed01/19/10 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Theodore B. Olson, SBN 38137 [e-mail] Matthew D. McGill, pro hac vice Amir C. Tayrani, SBN 229609 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone] Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., SBN 132009 [e-mail] Christopher D. Dusseault, SBN 177557 Ethan D. Dettmer, SBN 196046 Sarah E. Piepmeier, SBN 227094 Theane Evangelis Kapur, SBN 243570 Enrique A. Monagas, SBN 239087 333 S. Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone] BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP David Boies, pro hac vice [e-mail] 333 Main Street, Armonk, New York 10504 Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone] Jeremy M. Goldman, SBN 218888 [e-mail] Theodore H. Uno, SBN 248603 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 900, Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: [phone], Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs KRISTIN M. PERRY, SANDRA B. STIER, PAUL T. KATAMI, and JEFFREY J. ZARRILLO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KRISTIN M. PERRY, et al., Plaintiffs, and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants, and PROPOSITION 8 OFFICIAL PROPONENTS DENNIS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al., Defendant-Intervenors. CASE NO. 09-CV-2292 VRW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME TO RESPOND TO ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION

09-CV-2292 VRW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME
Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document487

Filed01/19/10 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

On January 19, 2010, Plaintiffs moved for an order shortening time for Defendant-Intervenors to respond to Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion for Sealing Order and to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Reopen Deposition of Ronald Prentice in his Personal Capacity and .as the Rule 30(b)(6) Representative for ProtectMarriage.com. After full consideration of all moving and opposing documents, the Court's record and file in this matter, and the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: (1) Defendant-Intervenors must file with the Court and serve a declaration establishing that the designated information in Plainitffs' Administrative Motion is sealable, and must lodge and serve a narrowly tailored proposed sealing order, or withdraw the designation of confidentiality no later than noon on January 19, 2010. (2) Defendant-Intervenors must file any opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Reopen Deposition of Ronald Prentice no later than 5:00 p.m. on January 19, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: ______________________________________ THE HONORABLE VAUGHN R. WALKER CHIEF JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

1
09-CV-2292 VRW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME