Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 512

ORDER of USCA (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2010)

Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al

Doc. 512

CCaee: 09-cv-02292-01/08/2010 Page: 1 of 1 ass 3 10-70063 VRW Document512 Filed01/22/10 Page1 of 1 DktEntry: 7188589

F IL E D
U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAN 08 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S

D E N N IS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al., Petitioners, v. U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF C A L IF O R N IA , Respondent, K R IS T IN M. PERRY; et al., Real Parties in Interest.

N o . 10-70063 D .C . No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco

ORDER

B efo re: SILVERMAN, PAEZ and BEA, Circuit Judges. P etitio n ers have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of th is court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U n ited States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied.

KS/MOATT

Dockets.Justia.com