Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
579
ORDER of USCA (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2010)
Perry et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
Doc. 579
CCaee: 09-cv-02292-01/08/2010 Page: 1 of 1 ass 3 10-70063 VRW Document579 Filed02/05/10 Page1 of 1 DktEntry: 7188589
F IL E D
U N IT E D STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAN 08 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U . S . C O U R T OF APPE A L S
D E N N IS HOLLINGSWORTH, et al., Petitioners, v. U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT F O R THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF C A L IF O R N IA , Respondent, K R IS T IN M. PERRY; et al., Real Parties in Interest.
N o . 10-70063 D .C . No. 3:09-cv-02292-VRW N o rth ern District of California, San Francisco
ORDER
B efo re: SILVERMAN, PAEZ and BEA, Circuit Judges. P etitio n ers have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of th is court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U n ited States Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied.
KS/MOATT
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?